do we need more rights in school?
Debate Rounds (5)
Also, what about freedom of speech? I've seen it happen, a group of kids were starting s petition about us being forced to go outside for recess when it's cold, they got in trouble. We aren't allowed to pray, talk about our sexual orientations (in a non bullying way), or religion, etc.
The school is controlling over all. We aren't allowed to have 2 orange juices. Orange juice! It's healthy but the school must be in control. We must stand outside in the morning before class unless it's raining, snowing, or under 40"F.
You willingly consent your rights as soon as you enter the building. It's part of what going to school legally entails. There is no "freedom of speech" or "freedom of religion" in school. Talking about sexual orientation or religion may be inappropriate or offensive to some, no matter what connotation you thought it had.
I can't say anything about orange juice, or standing outside in the morning, but 40 degrees Fahrenheit isn't cold.
Uniforms in a private school provide an equal playing field mentality, and it emphasizes everyone is equal and deserves to have their opinion heard. Plus, you don't have to worry about what to wear each day, and it distinguishes you from others on field trips to help prevent lost kids. Uniforms traditionally also are a symbol of school pride, just as sports jerseys are.
Some more rights being deprived of is the right to use the toilet when we have to! This is a serious issue! It may seem like I'm over exaggerating but: your bladder can burst, you could get a kidney stone, and more. When a teacher wouldn't let me use the bathroom because it was silent reading, I almost peed my pants, I knew it was about to happen, so I ran out the door and got in trouble for it!
The assumption that children should sit and listen has been repeatedly disproved by scientists, psychologists, and educators. Children learn from experience. Think: what teaches you not to touch a heated stove? Your mom telling you it'll hurt, or burning your finger? Students are constantly being shamed for adapting diffirent styles. Kids who learn slower or faster are ignored. Teachers constantly pick faverotes. Children can't get water from the water fountain at certain times. What happened to free will, and it's hard to concentrate on your work when you are thirsty.
This is where I got that information: http://www.educationrevolution.org...
It's also not fair children who defend themselves from being physically bullied get in trouble. Parents, what would you rather have happen to your child: Get injuries from a kid because they didn't defend themselves, or they get detention.
smlburridge forfeited this round.
I could compare this to reasons why workers strike, in factories such as The Triangle Shirt waist factory, would not let workers use the bathroom, or would rush them.
A teacher forced a kid to pee in a cup:
let me talk about psychological issues that could result in that. Of course that is absolutely humiliating, and she could be afraid to go to school the next day, get bullied, be afraid of showing her body or asking to use the restroom again, etc.
Here is something else absolutely outrages:
this is horrible. We have lunch for a reason, food is the most important survival need, when someone is hungry they can't focus on any activity other then getting food. How should you expect any 5-10 year old to focus on math or other subject without lunch. Milk and fruit isn't nearly enough. And what a waste of food, there are starving children in Africa people! Let's also consider the possibilities why they couldn't afford lunch: they could be poor, and barely have money for what they have!
A follow up: http://www.addictinginfo.org...
I can compare this with welfare and food banks, adults sign up for welfare because they can't support themselves, imagine the goverment just decided to stop it. Many people would die. Of starvation, dehydration, Coldness, etc. When a child needs to get free lunch they should get it. They shouldn't be humiliated because of something that isn't their fault.
Your first article is, well, 1) the kid's fault for purchasing "homework passes" with play money instead of bathroom passes (irresponsibility) and 2) is the case of a single teacher, in a single school, out of hundreds of thousands of students and teachers. Your cases are anecdotal. You cannot say that every teacher denies their kids bathroom breaks. And no, we don't need free lunches. These kids still received a snack- fruit and milk. I agree, it should have been handled differently, but not even workers have the right to free lunches. Not even the common worker.
Are you justifying this sort of behavior, it happens many places. Food is a survival need, as is using the bathroom. It should be respected, and everyone should get it.
Some rights from the constitution I could give a continues example of are:
First ammendment; religion is not respected at school. Teachers do little to nothing to stop bullying towards kids of religions frowned at (muslim, islam) and even in a way join it by letting it happen. Children aren't even allowed to pray, in a news story once you may have heard of, a kid was silently reading his bible in silent reading, and the teacher told him not to read it and made him put it on her desk. I've already given you examples of how freedom of speech is taken away.
The third ammendment says that no soldier shall be in any ones house without the owner's permission. I can compare this to teachers searching student's items without permission. Of course this isn't the same thing, but that is what it reminded me of.
I'm sorry I couldn't list them all but the source I was using to find the aammendments had some stupid pop up you couldn't ex out of and was trying to force me to buy something.
1) The cases you have cited are anecdotal. If it happens in many places, why don't we see more lawsuits or actual statistics on the subject? The specific cases you cited are also special, and have extraneous circumstances that must be considered.
2) If religion is, as you claim, not respected in school, then these schools are in violation of the students' individual rights. This can be found in the Lemon test from the Supreme Court Case Lemon vs. Kurtzman (1971): 1. state or school-sponsored activities must have a secular purpose 2. must *neither* advance nor inhibit religion 3. must not result in a excessive entanglement between government and religion.
This may seem like a backward explanation, but I would like to reiterate to the audience that the opponent's resolution is should we have *more* rights in school, not rights already guaranteed to us by the United States Constitution. When schools violate these rights, they are perfectly viable to being sued. And they have been, in many cases. But do we need more "rights" in school? No.
The third amendment does not even nearly relate here. When you enter schools, you consent to their policies regarding bag searches, locker searches, cellphone restrictions, etc. These schools aren't guilty of larceny or theft unless they keep the confiscated material permanently.
Thank you for your time, and I urge you vote against this resolution.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by gomergcc 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||6||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did make a good argument. Con failed to really address the issue in there arguments. Con cited no sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.