The Instigator
sen.mickeymouse
Con (against)
Losing
36 Points
The Contender
Tatarize
Pro (for)
Winning
41 Points

do you argree with homosexual adoption

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/1/2009 Category: Religion
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,990 times Debate No: 6723
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (11)

 

sen.mickeymouse

Con

do you agree with this?
i don't.....
Tatarize

Pro

A loving family is a loving family. Other than bigotry there's nothing bad about gays raising families. I'm not saying that out of the blue. They have actually done studies on it and other than having more first person contact with bigotry the kids of gay parents are just as well off as kids of any other couple.
Debate Round No. 1
sen.mickeymouse

Con

ok,i'll admit. I'm into a girl to girl relationship now. we dont talk much about this but we both disagree on this matter. we foresee the future, and we think adopting a child would make our relationship more complicated
Tatarize

Pro

There's no future needed. Gay couples are raising children. They are doing a marvelous job. There's no reason to suppose that they would do any worse than any other couple. In fact, many different studies have been done and they largely find that something like 5% of the differences between children are due to their parents. So long as parents provide a loving home, food and shelter, the rest is pretty much gravy. Kids do quite well when allowed to do quite well.

http://www.webmd.com...

Seriously, thousands of kids are being raised by gay couples and they are doing just fine. Kids are kids and cause as much of a problem as kids cause.
Debate Round No. 2
sen.mickeymouse

Con

but what if the parents do not have the capability to raise a child?
some homosexual couples want to adopt kids but they to not have enough income to support the needs of the child.
you should also think of the child's future if you want to become a good parent,
studies are just studies and not widely accepted.
and studies can be changed by the people around.
people determine the result of this studies
Tatarize

Pro

Parents without resources has nothing to do with homosexual adoption. Everybody thinks that adoptive parents should have the needed resources. If they don't have the money they can't adopt whether they are gay or straight. It has nothing to do with the argument.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by OrangeFizz 8 years ago
OrangeFizz
The con was idiotic by just taking their own civil strife and deciding that all gay couples shouldn't be able to adopt. This shouldn't even be a debate.
Posted by iamadragon 8 years ago
iamadragon
Why do some people (YOU) insist on using this site to promote your moronic douchebaggery? Get out of here.
Posted by Maya9 8 years ago
Maya9
Why do people insist on using this site like a damn chat room? I suppose that the obvious explanation would be that they are either painfully ignorant or just plain rude.
11 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tatarize 7 years ago
Tatarize
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by TFranklin62 8 years ago
TFranklin62
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 8 years ago
rougeagent21
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by resolutionsmasher 8 years ago
resolutionsmasher
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by JustCallMeTarzan 8 years ago
JustCallMeTarzan
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by zach12 8 years ago
zach12
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by zeeman48 8 years ago
zeeman48
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by bobby123 8 years ago
bobby123
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by LoveyounoHomo 8 years ago
LoveyounoHomo
sen.mickeymouseTatarizeTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:16