The Instigator
lifesaglitch911
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
XStrikeX
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

dogs are better than cats

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
XStrikeX
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/9/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,316 times Debate No: 18695
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

lifesaglitch911

Pro

In my opinion, I believe cats are superior to dogs because cats are not as intelligent,obedient or loving. Cats poop in litter boxes. Dogs poop outside, cats generally are " dumber " than dogs. Also there is a breed of dog right for everyone, there are only a few breeds of cats.
XStrikeX

Con

Thanks for starting this debate, lifesaglitch911.

As the Opposition, I negate the resolution that "dogs are better than cats."
Do to the 500 character cap, this will be short.

Nothing is wrong with excreting in a litter box.
My opponent has offered no evidence to back up his points. He says it is his opinion.


Whether or not a dog is better than a cat is entirely in opinion. Some people enjoy cats more than dogs, others vice-versa.

The BOP was on my opponent. The resolution has not been proved.

Thanks.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by eltigrey 5 years ago
eltigrey
lifesaglitch911XStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: More rounds Pro
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
lifesaglitch911XStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: What F16 said.
Vote Placed by F-16_Fighting_Falcon 5 years ago
F-16_Fighting_Falcon
lifesaglitch911XStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro argued the Con position.
Vote Placed by GaryBacon 5 years ago
GaryBacon
lifesaglitch911XStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side has any particularly convincing argument. But Pro made a clear grammatical error by stating that "cats are superior to dogs" when he clearly meant inferior.
Vote Placed by Man-is-good 5 years ago
Man-is-good
lifesaglitch911XStrikeXTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I'm confused by lifesaglitch911's argument: he' pro, so he should be arguing that "dogs are better than cats" but then he writes, "I believe cats are superior to dogs because cats are not as intelligent,obedient or loving." But then he goes on to write how cats are worse than dogs.... And yes, the BOP was on Pro, which he did not satisfy...