The Instigator
travistravistravis
Con (against)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
The_law
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

donuts healthy

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
The_law
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/4/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 570 times Debate No: 51632
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (7)

 

travistravistravis

Con

donuts are not healthy at all duhhhhhhh
The_law

Pro

Well yolo
Debate Round No. 1
travistravistravis

Con

well zion u are wrong and donuts have lots of sugar which is not good for the bodyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The_law

Pro

it depends it could be a healthy donut #yolo
Debate Round No. 2
travistravistravis

Con

well if u r a normal person and buy ur donuts at tim hortans then its not healthy and if u go to other stores
STILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL NOT HEEAALTHYYYY
The_law

Pro

it could be an all natural donut made with dirt and water and stuff like that so um that would taste really bad so you should try it
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Reasons for voting decision: What a waste of time.
Vote Placed by sadolite 3 years ago
sadolite
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con used condescension "DUH", conduct goes to pro. Cons grammar, atrocious. Con made no arguments at all. Neither used sources sources.
Vote Placed by Geogeer 3 years ago
Geogeer
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: We are all a little bit dumber as a result of this debate. Con's spelling and grammar were worse.
Vote Placed by Dakota-Hiltzman 3 years ago
Dakota-Hiltzman
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was funnier, pro argued better, pro's elongated consonants were annoying.
Vote Placed by Omnipotent 3 years ago
Omnipotent
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Ridiculous; Pro at least use some kind of logic (substitution with examples)
Vote Placed by Pokemonzr 3 years ago
Pokemonzr
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side was good at all. Because no good arguments and refutations were used, I will not describe my voting choices.
Vote Placed by kimmi 3 years ago
kimmi
travistravistravisThe_lawTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: not good at all