The Instigator
frenchmoose
Pro (for)
Losing
9 Points
The Contender
rougeagent21
Con (against)
Winning
32 Points

eagles should be forced to wearr shoes

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
rougeagent21
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/16/2010 Category: Education
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,639 times Debate No: 11759
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (7)

 

frenchmoose

Pro

yes yes indeed they do. i haz proof
rougeagent21

Con

I would like to see your proof. Please tell us why eagles should be forced to wear shoes.
Debate Round No. 1
frenchmoose

Pro

As we all know eagles are majestic birds that like to eat tiny useless creatures when possible.. they also like to eat food from useless garbage. (also churn butter in tibet) [1]

Eagles need to be forced to wear shoes because of the fact that they can use there talons to squeeze the life out of an elephant.. thats to powerful.. putting shoes on them would solve this problem...

I have also found through extensive research that eagles like to use those retarted sippy cups.. unacceptable? yeBUT putting shoes on the eagles would also have its bennifits.. the birds would be able to more comfortably perch themselves onto any ledge.

it would also give them something new to talk about.

Well after putting out my thoughts i await my opponents.

[1] http://api.ning.com...*OAogAxtira2fN8j-gZl53rJYEDt2ds8I6e7mL7fO9B3Bs8YXgLVaIYkDeh0YLXGoSMCxd8ibmal*QioRW3B5D72XA9/template.png
rougeagent21

Con

I negate on the grounds that such an action would clearly violate the Eagle Code put forth by Desmond Long Talon IV in 1654. The code clearly states that:

"...any bird of prey...is his own bird...(this part undecipherable) and is immune to the influence of the grounded. Let us keep our talons sharp and shiny in the sky... unobstructed by the claw-coverings of the grounded."

In addition, such a resolution is impossible to achieve. Eagles will never be subdued by us pitiful humans, as they are far to evasive and numerous.

Sippy cups are irrelevant. Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 2
frenchmoose

Pro

-"I negate on the grounds that such an action would clearly violate the Eagle Code put forth by Desmond Long Talon IV in 1654. The code clearly states that:..."- i would like to ask my opponent to give me a link to this, you know.. for possible proof?..-

-but why would i deny that this is truth? for no other reason but the fact that the book is a myth.. only i posses the real Eagle Code.-

-"...any bird of prey...is his own bird...(this part undecipherable) and is immune to the influence of the grounded. Let us keep our talons sharp and shiny in the sky... unobstructed by the claw-coverings of the grounded."- *coughbscough*

-"Eagles will never be subdued by us pitiful humans"- if we can tame the mighty walrus then the eagle will be nothing.-

-"Sippy cups are irrelevant"- No sir YOU are irrelevent.

-I await my opponents response-
rougeagent21

Con

Clearly, Eagles do not have a need for the internet. Why then would they post it online? It is a sacred tradition passed down by each generation. My opponent can clearly not possess the code since it is but an oral tradition. Do not believe his lies.

I am sorry to hear that my opponent is sick with coughing symptoms.

I am not irrelevant as I am the contender. Such an important role in a debate is certainly not irrelevant. If I were, this would not be a real debate. (Is it anyway?)

I urge a NEG vote.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Qetzlcoatl 7 years ago
Qetzlcoatl
People on this website are very tolerant.
Posted by frenchmoose 7 years ago
frenchmoose
i welcome your complement
Posted by rougeagent21 7 years ago
rougeagent21
Better.
Posted by frenchmoose 7 years ago
frenchmoose
bacause those are fail.. you can tell cause they came from your keyboard
Posted by rougeagent21 7 years ago
rougeagent21
Why all of these lame comebacks? How about something different like "you fascist soot-loving monkey!" or "you nefarious communist bastard!" something original like that...
Posted by frenchmoose 7 years ago
frenchmoose
your unoriginal
Posted by rougeagent21 7 years ago
rougeagent21
Not really, its unoriginal. Otherwise, it would be in contention.
Posted by Sorrow 7 years ago
Sorrow
"no sir YOU are irrelevant"

quote of the year.
Posted by Qetzlcoatl 7 years ago
Qetzlcoatl
I feel as if Con came out of nowhere with the Eagle law (or something similar). He's lucky that was there.
Posted by frenchmoose 7 years ago
frenchmoose
nooo my pics dont work???
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by Marauder 7 years ago
Marauder
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Moistcabbage 7 years ago
Moistcabbage
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Danielle 7 years ago
Danielle
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by TFranklin62 7 years ago
TFranklin62
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by sidobagga 7 years ago
sidobagga
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Comrade_Ulyanov 7 years ago
Comrade_Ulyanov
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:24 
Vote Placed by rougeagent21 7 years ago
rougeagent21
frenchmooserougeagent21Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03