The Instigator
nafz
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zanomi3
Pro (for)
Winning
19 Points

english

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Zanomi3
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/15/2014 Category: Society
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 953 times Debate No: 63279
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

nafz

Con

are music artists good role models to young children

(start with an intro)
Zanomi3

Pro

I accept this debate. Being pro, I believe that music artists are good role models to young children, especially when pushing them to work towards their dreams. While there are some that may have a negative influence, there are definitely more that have a positive influence on the majority of the population. Country singers, for example, specifically a few female ones, have demonstrated that they are able to work to a position of fame all while maintaining strong values and focuses on school [1].

Seeing as I only have five minutes to write this argument, I will have to end here.

Sources:

[1] - http://www.savingcountrymusic.com...
Debate Round No. 1
nafz

Con

nafz forfeited this round.
Zanomi3

Pro

My arguments were dropped, along with no arguments presented by my opponent. All arguments extended.

Vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by DanK 2 years ago
DanK
When you say music artist, to which artists do you refer and to what age group of children? Your topic is definitely interesting to me, however it is very vague.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
nafzZanomi3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by republicofdhar 2 years ago
republicofdhar
nafzZanomi3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro deserves points for all the above. He made a good argument and used a source, whereas Con did neither. S&G were also definitely better on Pro's side.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
nafzZanomi3Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: ff, pro only one to use sources