The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
7 Points


Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/2/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 326 times Debate No: 77207
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)




existence is in contrast with experience, so true existence is my physical experience

with no one to experience it there is no one to verify that it exist

to worms, the beauty of rainbows dosnt exist



Existence and experience are never mutually exclusive. They are indeed separate but part of a greater whole (like 2 separate sides of the same coin). Existence shapes experience (my eyes allow me to see in the visual spectrum) just so experience shapes existence (education and learning done by my eyes leads me to making good choices).

Each organism on earth is born with specific sensory capacity that is a result of a series of genetic trial and error leading to a specific type of existence (that is favored by the larger environmental existence) hence shaping a specific and unique type of experience.

When you say "with no one to experience there is no one to verify that it exist"
I am guessing you mean that: experience shapes existence... Without experience you cannot have existence...
Well I will say the opposite it is equally true: without existence shaping the evolution of the observer there would be no one to experience to begin with.... meaning existence shapes experience... Without existence you cannot have experience.
Debate Round No. 1


if you remove reality, you can have no experience, but if you remove experience you can have no reality, as there is no one to verify that it exist, but more importantly experience and reality is the necessary root for existence

without experience of it, 1 billions years is like a second

experience shapes existence like we can create machines, but im not sure what you mean

a blind man cant know what is on a picture i am showing him, the picture dosnt have true existence to him, he could at best believe my story about whats on it

to me anything i can experience exist, and beyond reality and experience is non existence



Well according to your equation:

existence - experience = reality

existence - reality = experience

Both equations infer that experience is unreal which actually contradicts your stand which is:
Experience is the only thing that dictates what is real and what exists.

I think you need to think things through before you post them to the public.
Debate Round No. 2


you cant experience reality without true experience

and no they dont infer that..

life is true experience



Your arguments make little to no sense. You keep using abstract terms and fail to define them properly.

How on Earth would you experience smell (olfaction) without the evolution and existence of chemoreceptors within your nose??? How would you experience the visual spectrum without pre existing retinal cones and rods shaping your experience.

You have a deluded and overly relativistic sense of reality. In fact I think I am getting dumber trying to teach you common sense
Debate Round No. 3


life is matter, i dont understand your point, life is true, real


I think I lost a few neurons reading that.
Debate Round No. 4


What a waste of time
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
Posted by ChickenBakuba 1 year ago
Sad how I agree on Con about infectious stupidity and how I lost neurons and IQ reading this
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
sad what
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
the arguments are there
Posted by ChickenBakuba 1 year ago
So sad how he posted his Debate 2 times, I wager he prepared for the argument in advance
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Martley 1 year ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: I award all points to Con.