false=anywhere beyond my personal physical experience of now
Debate Rounds (5)
true is the opposite of false and truth, and false is the opposite of truth, true is matter now and the future and past is information
not true=not now
future is ahead of now, now is matter
Imagination- "The faculty of imagining, or of forming mental images and concepts of what is not actually present to the senses."
Future- "Time that is to be or come hereafter."
False- "Not true or correct; erroneous."
Although your senses cannot detect the future, the future isn't false by any means. The future is still correct; otherwise, it would never be converted to the present and the past, meaning nothing would exist, or time would stop. Imagination can also be applied to the present and the past. You can imagine about things right now and you have imagined things in the past, but for the future to be imagination would simply mean either nothing exists, or it would be manipulated with our imagination. No human can control the future. If someone could imagine the future, imagination would then become reality. It cannot be both, making this belief illogical.
to say 5 seconds ahead of now is true is to say reality is 5 seconds ahead of reality
future is always imaginary, now is true
now=reality loop 1 second or less
imagination is future, there is no future without imagination
if imagination is future, you're saying that there is no future without future. Obviously. Now=present, not future or past. There is no time loop, now is just now. Future can be imagined, but the subject itself isn't an imagination. If the future is false, so is everything else.
vi_spex forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Chaosism 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments were largely incoherent, and his formatting hurt readability. Con's rebuttals successfully negated the resolution. Con used the only source.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.