The Instigator
Shashankraj
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Mascista
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

fine art is better than performing art

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/7/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 869 times Debate No: 35358
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Shashankraj

Con

performing is better than wining as performing gives us an beautiful experience and makes us more courageous towards the topic : performing art is better than performing most beautiful art.
Mascista

Pro

Although I much prefer Fine Arts (I am working to be an artist), I would say that arts can be united as one universal language, a language of expression, imagination, impression, and beauty. Fine Arts would be better, because of the fact that imagination is of such boundlessness, our human body is incapable of expressing complex and elaborate expressions through movement. With utensils, we (fine)artists are capable of creating ever-lasting work of meticulous details.
Debate Round No. 1
Shashankraj

Con

Shashankraj forfeited this round.
Mascista

Pro

Performing Art has many limitations. Fine Arts lasts forever, where Performing Arts can only be seen through real-time, paintings, pictures, etc. Fine Arts can be used to depict Performing Arts, and thanks to Fine Arts, we can get a sense and knowledge of the past culture before photography was invented. Without the help of Fine Arts, we would never have had any ideas of the past, and there will be no traditional performing art.
Debate Round No. 2
Shashankraj

Con

Shashankraj forfeited this round.
Mascista

Pro

Mascista forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.