The Instigator
moonclip
Pro (for)
Winning
18 Points
The Contender
Daysuit
Con (against)
Losing
9 Points

flyingis better then creating forcefields

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/5/2008 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,199 times Debate No: 4911
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (11)
Votes (9)

 

moonclip

Pro

i think flying is better because you can see monuments at a birds eye view. you can also get to places easier and faster.so as you see flying would be better.i know this might sound like a closing statement but you got to give me some slack i am only 12
Daysuit

Con

I can't believe I'm taking on this debate with a 12 year old, but I'm just that bored.

Now to pose the stance of flying being better than creating force fields you have to examine the topic at hand very closely. Is flying better than having a force field? Can you give examples of how flying is better than a force field?
Define flying, I mean I can already fly in a plane and if I need a real birds eye view I can parachute out of a plane as well.

So tell me this what type of flying are we talking about here, Superman? Are we to judge whether or not Superman, Goku, or Neo and what type of super hero flying is better. Speaking of the Matrix Neo had both of the abilities I think that you are alluding to, so by definition perhaps having both is better than one or the other.
Debate Round No. 1
moonclip

Pro

wellheres your example you wanted i am thinking flying like superman. or would you like to create force feilds is what the debate title should be but any ways i think every thing would more going green as people would say. i mean that you wouldnt use gas to go any were well any ways i got to go eat desert so remember vote 4 me peoples
Daysuit

Con

Daysuit forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
moonclip

Pro

moonclip forfeited this round.
Daysuit

Con

Daysuit forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
11 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by EmeraldLance 5 years ago
EmeraldLance
Did I seriously just read that?
Posted by Logical-Master 8 years ago
Logical-Master
It depends. If Flight also grants me the ability to fly at 3x mach speed without suffering any body damage, then flight easily. Otherwise, I think a forcefield is easily more practical. In fact, theoeretically, I would be able to fly via force field if I could say use the force field to block even gravity itself as well as manipulate the air around me. I could also make myself become invisible.
Posted by brian_eggleston 8 years ago
brian_eggleston
I bet he's not 12...I bet he's probably really 42 and is using phrases such as "give me some slack i'm only 12" and "I got to go eat desert" to get votes from middle-aged women who think that sort of thing is cute. It's working too, he's beating his opponent flat!
Posted by gahbage 8 years ago
gahbage
"He eats deserts?"

I just had two for breakfast.
Posted by bullslapper 8 years ago
bullslapper
I would have go with a force field. How many of you remember a movie where some kids made a force field and then flew inside of it, going to a space ship ,in outer space.
A force field would offer protection where just flying does not.
Don't give up you will get better at debating. I will debate with you anytime.
Posted by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
lol, he had a point with the flying thing, very low emissions!
Posted by LR4N6FTW4EVA 8 years ago
LR4N6FTW4EVA
He eats deserts?
"i got to go eat desert"

Weird kid.
Posted by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
makes me wander what his future political standings will be.
Posted by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
Pro wins... wow, 12?
Id go for force field though.
Posted by gahbage 8 years ago
gahbage
I cringed.

25 characters.
9 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Vote Placed by Captain.America 8 years ago
Captain.America
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Daysuit 8 years ago
Daysuit
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by brian_eggleston 8 years ago
brian_eggleston
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by DarkBitch 8 years ago
DarkBitch
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Puck 8 years ago
Puck
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Katie01 8 years ago
Katie01
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Labrat228 8 years ago
Labrat228
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by gahbage 8 years ago
gahbage
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by PoeJoe 8 years ago
PoeJoe
moonclipDaysuitTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30