The Instigator
Kelvinebuka
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Lee001
Con (against)
Winning
24 Points

football is better than fashion

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Lee001
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/22/2015 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 466 times Debate No: 73987
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (4)

 

Kelvinebuka

Pro

Football is better than fashion because,football is a game of pasion a game which is played by people who are skilled and trained ,who has courage to be the best.in football they are many things to consider
Competions
Rivals
Being the best and many more which fashion does not conside of
Lee001

Con

Pro has the BoP to show that football is infact better then fashion.

Football is not a necessity.

A necessity is : The condition or quality of being necessary.
https://dictionary.search.yahoo.com...

Fashion consist of "clothing". Clothing is a necessity. You must wear clothes while in public, our you could get arrested.

Football is not "better" to all people, for some people don't understand it. Mostly everyone knows what fashion is, because they wear clothing.
Debate Round No. 1
Kelvinebuka

Pro

Kelvinebuka forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Kelvinebuka

Pro

Kelvinebuka forfeited this round.
Lee001

Con

Vote CON :D
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Lee001 2 years ago
Lee001
I didn't ask you too Marshall.
Posted by cybertron1998 2 years ago
cybertron1998
I don't think i can vote on this. I agree on neither con nor pro. Pro did forfeit but Con uses the association fallacy with "Fashion consists of clothes, clothes are a necessity, therefore Fashion is a necessity." A=B and B=C therefore A must=C. But thats just not true. Fashion according to merriam webster is defined as "a popular way of dressing during a particular time or among a particular group of people." http://www.merriam-webster.com...

The styling and following of a trend is not a necessity. Wearing clothes does not constitute the necessity of Fashion.

Sorry hannah, but I can't vote on this
Posted by Lee001 2 years ago
Lee001
Why did you challenge me?
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
KelvinebukaLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Con. Pro forfeited the majority of the debate except R1, which is rarely acceptable conduct in any debate setting. | S&G - Con. Pro's punctuation is especially poor as Pro included a comma after "because", which is a conjunction. Pro spells "passion" incorrectly as well, and forgets a comma after "passion". "in" is not capitalized in the beginning of the sentence. "Conside" is not even a word. Con makes only two errors: she spells "or" as "our" and "in fact" as "infact". Thus, S&G to Con. | Arguments - Con. Pro's sole argument consisted of bare assertions that did little to affirm the resolution. Con showed how fashion is a necessity whereas football is not. Pro's forfeiture made them unable to refute any arguments. | Sources - Con. She used the sole sources. | 7 points to Con. | As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
KelvinebukaLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Canuckleball 2 years ago
Canuckleball
KelvinebukaLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro effectively forfeited this debate.
Vote Placed by kingkd 2 years ago
kingkd
KelvinebukaLee001Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF by Pro. Pro didnt fulfill BOP