The Instigator
Zombie_Girl13
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tylersch96
Con (against)
Winning
1 Points

freedom to love!

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
tylersch96
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/20/2013 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 506 times Debate No: 37951
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

Zombie_Girl13

Pro

Love isnt restrained to just a man and woman people.. Im bisexual and have a boyfriend and i love him, but i could have ended up with a female had i missed my chance with him.. religion blinds people with morals that dont exist, and you really shouldnt yet some supernatural entity decide stuff for you, you have a brain of your own dont you??
tylersch96

Con

So what you are saying is that in the constitution there are no morals stated in it? In the bible it says you must not murder and in America murder is a crime. So biblical morals are present today. As for love, I to am bisexual and it depends on your mental capability to love.
Debate Round No. 1
Zombie_Girl13

Pro

Zombie_Girl13 forfeited this round.
tylersch96

Con

My argument stands.
Debate Round No. 2
Zombie_Girl13

Pro

Zombie_Girl13 forfeited this round.
tylersch96

Con

That was a difficult debate. Their rebukes were intimidating. NOT!!
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by kyuubey 3 years ago
kyuubey
This is an absolute mess. In a debate you need to properly clarify the topic, the definitions regarding the issues of the topic. Furthermore within the debate you need a propery opening argument, a contention and evidence.

I also got some issues on both pro and con regarding this.

Pro, you have not clarified on what kind of freedom of love you are referring to, i assume you are referring to love specifically based on consensual human adults. Your current argumentation leaves you wide open for the argument that it also means you should have the freedom to love animals and children.

Con, murder is not a rule that is purely based on biblical morality. There where rules long before the ten commandments that said not to murder. In our modern society we generally base rules on how they affect individuals or society and whether something is harmfull or not. You will have to provide a logical reason as to why love between two consensual adults is intentionally harmfull.
Posted by TheEnergyHippo 3 years ago
TheEnergyHippo
This is not a real debate.
Posted by Gordontrek 3 years ago
Gordontrek
Please clarify your position here. Are you arguing that "alternate lifestyles" such as bisexualism are acceptable in that love isn't only between the opposite gender, or that religious morals don't exist?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
imabench
Zombie_Girl13tylersch96Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This isnt even a real debate. Both sides gave a hilariously one sided and un-supported opinion as their entire argument and then basically spent the final rounds doing nothing. Conduct to con though since pro did FF