The Instigator
frozenispoo
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
imabench
Con (against)
Winning
22 Points

frozen is poo

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
imabench
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/6/2015 Category: Movies
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,218 times Debate No: 78435
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (15)
Votes (6)

 

imabench

Con

(BOP is on Pro)

I don't know who you are...

I don't know what you want...

If you are looking for me to give a f*** I can tell you I ran out of those a long time ago...

But what I do have are a very particular set of skills...

Trolling skills I have acquired over a very long career...

Skills that make me a nightmare for pathetic noobs like you...

If you let me win this debate that'll be the end of it.

But if you don't... i WILL find you

And I will troll the loving f*** out of you
Debate Round No. 1
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
The standard for troll debates applies here. The title clearly shows that this was an effort merely to troll fans of Frozen. His argument was spam, but the debate itself is a troll one. Whether he was willing to produce an actual argument should affect votes, but it doesn't affect moderation's perspective of the votes.
Posted by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
There's a difference between a spam debate and a troll debate though. Troll debates yeah, just about anything goes in terms of voting, but on spam debates where one side doesnt even make an argument, votes from that of Pericles and TheChristian are just blatant votebombs. 1 round spam debates where the instigator doesnt even care to make an argument is equivalent of a full forfeit, which is what pro did here. Therefore votes awarding him argument points are clear votebombs
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
Hopefully, you're seeking to vote reasonably on any debate. But when it comes to troll debates where the debate itself just isn't serious, they can't expect voters to take it seriously. Moderation has more than enough serious debates to deal with, adding debates like this to our workload is not useful.
Posted by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
"We do not moderate troll debates." So I can literally vote for some stupid reason?
Posted by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
Its not trolling if im the one actually winning and doing the actual trolling ;)
Posted by frozenispoo 1 year ago
frozenispoo
You didn't troll this debate because we started the debate with YOU just to get your reaction, so technically we trolled you
Posted by frozenispoo 1 year ago
frozenispoo
This isn't a spam debate this is a troll debate, we don't actually hate frozen we were just messing around with you all tbh
Posted by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
This isnt a troll debate, its a 1 round spam debate that I happened to troll
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
****************************************************************
>Reported vote: Pericles// Mod action: NOT Removed<

3 points to Pro (Arguments) 1 point to Con (S&G). Spelling and grammar goes to Con because Pro had two words, and one of them was incorrect. It should have been "it's," not "its." Arguments go to Pro because Con didn't actually argue; they just mad libbed Taken.

[*Reason for non-removal*] We do not moderate troll debates.
******************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
****************************************************************
>Reported vote: TheChristian// Mod action: NOT Removed<

1 points to Pro (Conduct). Con used the f bomb. Neither argued.

[*Reason for non-removal*] We do not moderate troll debates.
******************************************************************************
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: BOP was on Pro, and they never fulfilled it, choosing instead to simply restate the original resolution.
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 1 year ago
Logical-Master
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Policy Vote. Trolling ain't cool!
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better spelling. Plus the mod doesn't care so full points to IMABENCH, cause he is a liberal.
Vote Placed by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments go to con because he mad libbed taken. Conduct to con for pro forgetting to use the "F bomb"
Vote Placed by TheChristian 1 year ago
TheChristian
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con used the f bomb. Neither argued.
Vote Placed by PericIes 1 year ago
PericIes
frozenispooimabenchTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Spelling and grammar goes to Con because Pro had two words, and one of them was incorrect. It should have been "it's," not "its." Arguments go to Pro because Con didn't actually argue; they just mad libbed Taken.