gay marriage and why transsexual once had the right to marry now doesnt
Debate Rounds (3)
Their are varous groups in christen/catholic/islam/jewish tranditions that accept gay marriage and is not agaisnt god. gautma buddha saw that male monk change to female and so went and lived with feale nuns. homosexuality though is accepted because buddha teaches compassion its igorance and the influence of the monks who urged gautma buddha make a ban of pandak gays and transsexuals soly because of celibacy and not as a negative who they represent.
their are 10 million buddhist in the usa not to uch other pagans not in that figure. And then a third to half of those who are of the christan/catholic/jewish/islamic accept gay marriage until the influence of mormons, some catholics/jewish/islamic and mostly baptist and evanglicals. though their was a evangilical priest who retranslated the bible in its origenal language and found no negative forms glbt concept in the bible though he was excumenated does that ring any bells on some faous sciencetist who are now considered right.
homosexuality is not wrong look at the psyc journels that are accepted in the psyc community about gay couples and children they turn out fine, what about single parents again they turn out fine. the argument you need a other and father not same is weak. to homosexuality is not a choose nor can you cure it or should you, again look at the psyc journels. The argument that anal sex can be rough is weak, so cant hetereosexual sex.
the argument a male to female is a man again is weak look at the psyc journels. god knew in the wob and yet medical i am a women then it proves a pro for transsexuals. the idea your body is a tob respect well opps their goes cancer treament, coenical diesease treament platic surgery when god tells you to die then you die.
Their an argument i heard from the far right that cheating is the samme as gay sin. well then why do you still support politeceans who are antigay and yet cheat hypocritease i beleive. As i buddhist i will say this i knew god in his tie in one of my past lives he more knostic then anything and he had no problem with gays if you look at a historian point of view that came later with such people and others as constitne. a write as you will wouldnt that be blapshmy to god. why is is christen to teach god is like a buddhist onk and try to be like god then they turn out to be toned down versions of nazis teaching and acting without love and compassion. I can prove past lives and experiance i seen and so have others sciencetist though a fringe study have proven cases in india children knowing things that they shouldnt to an accurate degree. what does the bible prove nothing its a book unless you go to the expraince of saints but most christens argue saints are a catholic thing and arnt congruent in chritenanity. were more christens are agaisnt gays then catholics. isnt funny that the last pope god incarnate was gay friendly but the current pope who has questionally actions to jews during the holocaust and now with priest abuse cases.
i aint anti god believe or not all the jewish sages,christ,mohammed and god himself to a buddhist point view are saints called bodhisattvas. theirs a rule that protects the minority in the constitution theirs also rule thier to congress shall make no law for or agaisnt a religous estblishment and separation church and state. so the marriage law agaisnt homosexuality is unconstitional and goes agaisnt other religions were a set of beliefs by a set of people is religion ie buddhism ie science ie atheism. but the problem with civial unions is equality beleive it or not the civil rights law for blacks include alll races and groups so that means gays. its religous marriage thats is higher then court marriage and so this idea again is not equal either separate but equal. going into other countries from a religous point of view telling them to stop gay marriage and killing/curing gays and stopping trade with the us goes agaisnt our foreign as long as your citzrn of our country you reprent us including religous organizations. in the christen bible you can always find god/bible people say one thing agaisnt and then say another for so is god a hypocrit or is its people remmber the bible was inspiried by god by written by man. how can i know so uch about the bible well i raised christen.
all my arguments are here
1. You are for gay marriage. Your support for this is that there were some Buddhist monks who were cool when "transsexuals were coming on to them", there are some (unknown and un-cited) religious groups that accept gay marriage, and because gay couples that have children "turn out fine" and anyone who disagrees needs to "look at the psych journals." What is your argument here? What religious groups? What psych journals?
2. You can "prove past lives and experiance i seen and so have others sciencetist though a fringe study have proven cases in india children knowing things that they shouldnt to an accurate degree." I would like this proof and its source before I can debate that.
3. You are a transsexual and "the argument a male to female is a man again is weak look at the psych journals (again)." because "god knew in the wob and yet medical i am a women then it proves a pro for transsexuals". Again, where is the argument?
Here are some questions that you posed:
a) "why do you still support politeceans who are antigay and yet cheat hypocritease i beleive"
b) "why is is christen to teach god is like a buddhist onk and try to be like god then they turn out to be toned down versions of nazis teaching and acting without love and compassion."
If we are on the same page, please clarify and confirm your topics. For clarity purposes, I would also request that my opponent check her spelling and grammar before proceeding with the debate so I can coherently read and correctly respond to the arguments. Since my opponent has chosen Pro for this debate, the burden of proof is on her. Therefore, she must back up her claims with scientific proof on the topics of "gay marriage and why transsexual once had the right to marry now doesnt".
tempus_erus forfeited this round.
tempus_erus forfeited this round.
Peace to everyone.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||7|
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.