The Instigator
mrholygod
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Satanta
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

genocide is okay if you're christian

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
mrholygod
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/4/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 428 times Debate No: 66337
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)

 

mrholygod

Pro

genocide is a-okay if you are a christian
also flooding the earth was a perfectly fine because everybody simultaneously went evil
Satanta

Con

So you can kill millions of Christians horribly if you're Christian?

And how can rocks turn evil?
Debate Round No. 1
mrholygod

Pro

rocks never turned evil man turned wicked
Quoth the bible

Genesis 6:5 - 10:32

5 Then the LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great on the earth, and that every intent of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 The LORD was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.
7 The LORD said, "I will blot out man whom I have created from the face of the land, from man to animals to creeping things and to birds of the sky; for I am sorry that I have made them."
Satanta

Con

But if the Flood happened rocks were surely destroyed

So did rocks turn evil and have to be punuished
Debate Round No. 2
mrholygod

Pro

rocks aren't living things
you spend time in neither my holy church or in school
shame on you
If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this person's religion is worthless.
Satanta

Con

Then why didn't God just give a heart attack to anyone? He did not need to destroy rocks needlessly

The answer is that God does not exist
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Shadowhuntress 2 years ago
Shadowhuntress
I can't vote on this debate. No logical arguments were made.
Posted by notyourbusiness 2 years ago
notyourbusiness
The entire "debate", if it can be called one, is totally incomprehensible. It has no logic, no argument and an equally unreasonable topic. When I clicked in I was expecting things such as Bible passages referring to the slaughtering of enemy cities (at one point this was supposedly stated to be okay, of course the phrase can be interpreted freely and some argue that it only applied back then and not now) or something similar, but no, here we are talking about rocks, which aren't even alive.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
mrholygodSatantaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: con even concedes that God can give heart attacks to everyone and it wouldn't matter. Thus, pro wins.