The Instigator
the_random_melon
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Gileandos
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

gila monsters are not reptiles

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/21/2011 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,015 times Debate No: 19398
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

the_random_melon

Pro

the simple fact that gila monsters wear blue suede shoes affirms the fact that gila monsters are not reptile. that is all
Gileandos

Con

Interesting debate.


Seeing that Gila Monsters do not wear Blue Suede shoes, shows we could conclude the obvious?


Unless my opponent has evidence of this silly proposition…






I just happen to have a pet Gila Monster and amazingly enough he seemed to shake his head a little when I played the video…


Wait, he seems irate when I play the song…



Damn… he… bit… me………proof….they…hate….blue…. suede…nnnnghh....

Debate Round No. 1
the_random_melon

Pro

I will affirm the resolution with 10 points:
one: im surprised that u accepted my debate
Two: im sure that some stupid owners put blue suede shoes on their gila monster
three: im surprised u have a gila monster
four: im sorry it bit u
five: what do u feel about george bush
six: that last argument made no sense
seven: do u know what im eating for dinner
eight: its kinda hard making up all these arguments on the spot
nine: next year will be 2012 ( i think)
ten: i dont have any more arguments
Gileandos

Con

After coming home from the Emergency Room:

I have opened this debate to be appalled.

My opponent has gone mad!

My opponent first asserts:


“I will affirm the resolution with 10 points:”

My opponent need only put forth one! Evidence of a Gila Monster wearing blue suede shoes!

He then rambles on…


”one: im surprised that u accepted my debate”

Of course I would accept the debate. My Monster said I had too….


”Two: im sure that some stupid owners put blue suede shoes on their gila monster”

That is absurd argument! Stupid owners would never put blue suede shoes on their Monsters, they would get bit!


”three: im surprised u have a gila monster”

Come to think of it…. So am I.


”four: im sorry it bit u”

What… do you think I am infected too?


”five: what do u feel about george bush”

How did you know my Gila Monsters name? Your not one of those stalkers trying to look at peoples Monsters are you?


”six: that last argument made no sense”

What are you talking about??


”seven: do u know what im eating for dinner”

Haggis? A true Scotsman would eat Haggis.


”eight: its kinda hard making up all these arguments on the spot”

What arguments?

“nine: next year will be 2012 ( i think)”

Are you threatening my Monster?


”ten: i dont have any more arguments”

I did not see the first one?



Seeing that my opponent has managed to accomplish nothing but to impeach the moral character of my Monster….

And I have positive evidence of a violent reaction from my Monster to wearing any kind of garment….

The resolution stands clearly negated.
Debate Round No. 2
the_random_melon

Pro

the_random_melon forfeited this round.
Gileandos

Con

I believe that my opponent has realized there is no refuting the clear evidence that Gila Monsters do not wear blue suede shoes.

This is in addition to the fact that zero evidence or sources were used by my opponent.

We can even extrapolate from my source (Elvis) that indeed he would have owned a Gila Monster if Gila Monster's wore blue suede shoes.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by 16kadams 5 years ago
16kadams
Why did this tie? Con ----> deserves win.
Posted by Gileandos 5 years ago
Gileandos
tsk tsk. A waste!
No votes have been placed for this debate.