The Instigator
awsomewargames001
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
JohnMaynardKeynes
Pro (for)
Winning
35 Points

globalization...good or bad (yes=good ; no=bad)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
JohnMaynardKeynes
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/23/2014 Category: Economics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,240 times Debate No: 55310
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (8)

 

awsomewargames001

Con

I need help for an E.L.A. project. I NEED TO KNOW!!! Is it good or bad?
JohnMaynardKeynes

Pro

Unfortunately I have 10 minutes and 500 characters, so I don't have much time for sources.

Yes, globalization is a good thing.

1. Integrating ideas, resources, and cultures is fundamentally good as it inspires new ideas and brings out the best in people.
2. Cultures evolve, anyway, so there isn't any fear of losing cultural identity.
3. Free trade is and has always been a boon to local economies, and is conducive to innovation, lower-cost goods, economic growth, and more efficient economies.
Debate Round No. 1
awsomewargames001

Con

awsomewargames001 forfeited this round.
JohnMaynardKeynes

Pro

My opponent has forfeited, in the process dropping all of my arguments.

Please vote Pro.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Cold-Mind 3 years ago
Cold-Mind
Having universal language is great, but having one government ruling the entire world is dreadful.
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Raymond_Reddington 3 years ago
Raymond_Reddington
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Ff
Vote Placed by baus 3 years ago
baus
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: FF without sources and better S&g for Pro.
Vote Placed by DerKing 3 years ago
DerKing
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit and no arguments.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
lannan13
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: No arguments and forfeit.
Vote Placed by Kc1999 3 years ago
Kc1999
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: This wasn't a debate. This was a homework help thing.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 years ago
Zarroette
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments went uncontested, due to Con's forfeit.
Vote Placed by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
awsomewargames001JohnMaynardKeynesTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: ff