The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
5 Points

god cant be real, because to feel joy one must be able to feel pain

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 11 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 265 times Debate No: 82448
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




This is my first ever debate on this site. Please go easy on me.. :)

I will be arguing that God is Real. I refute the motion that "god cant be real, because to feel joy one must be able to feel pain"

I will let my opponent start off with his arguments.
Debate Round No. 1


that is the argument.. god cant be sick because god is not healthy, god is dead


Well, this is obviously a troll debate. I am clearly wasting my time. My opponent is giving half hearted answers and is not putting forth any points.

Anyway, first my opponent says God is not real. Then, he says God is dead. If God is not real, God cannot be dead. If God is dead, then God is real.

My argument now is God is real and he is defienitely not dead. I support this claim by my own observation that this world and all its complex creations were made by God and we are all here for a higher purpose. That's all.
Debate Round No. 2



creation dosnt happen in reality
Debate Round No. 3
Debate Round No. 4


you need it


Lol. Pass.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by 1234abcdjeetdunnee 11 months ago
Lika pewpew
Posted by vi_spex 11 months ago
so obviusly a troll debate that you have been blocked
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by ZacGraphics 11 months ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: It's pretty obvious of the winner here, regardless of the fact that vi_spex is a troll. Even further, Con still put out his argument, which is admirable. No points awarded to reliable sources.