The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
FullMetal.Alchemist
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

god is a fart that never happend

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
FullMetal.Alchemist
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/14/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 348 times Debate No: 77676
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

religious people just insist that a poo that never happend, does smell
FullMetal.Alchemist

Con

Pro is making a positive claim and therefore has the burden of proof.

So far he has not made any attempt at fulfilling his burden, only writing a single incoherent sentence.

I await an actual argument.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

my claim is simply true, if a fart never happend it never smelled
FullMetal.Alchemist

Con

I agree - that claim IS true. However, that is not the claim being made in the resolution.

I continue to await an actual argument in favor of the resolution.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

are you telling me a poo that never happend smells?
FullMetal.Alchemist

Con

No, I'm telling you that nothing you've said so far supports the resolution in any way.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

god is not a fart that never happend?
FullMetal.Alchemist

Con

That's what I'm advocating, yes.

What you're advocating is that God IS a fat that never happened. But you have yet to say anything in support of the advocacy.

Still awaiting an actual argument...
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

that is the argument which is the proof, a fart that never happend isnt real.. nor do i have a honest story to tell about it..

what is your evidence
FullMetal.Alchemist

Con

It's the final round, and Pro has not done anything to show that God is a fart that never happened.

His burden of proof remains unfulfilled. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by Yoozureeson 1 year ago
Yoozureeson
This was a debate that never happened....and it smelled.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
you didnt challenge my claim
Posted by sara_ann_dee 1 year ago
sara_ann_dee
We just had this debate...
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
vi_spexFullMetal.AlchemistTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con wins solely on account of the BoP. Pro fails to affirm that God is a fart that never happened -- while he does have some impacts that there is a fart that never happens, and weaves a semantic argument saying since a fart didn't happen, it isn't really a fart, so the resolution merely says "God is," but the argument is insufficiently explained and lacks some links. While I understand what Pro was insinuating, debaters should presume that every voter is tabula rasa, i.e. has no outside knowledge. Voters -- under their obligation to act as blank slates -- shouldn't vote on such insufficiently explained arguments. Since I'm dismissing Pro's only argument, I award the victory to Con due to failure to fulfill BoP. I was tempted to award S&G to Con due to Pro's failure to punctuate and misspelling "happened," but I don't think it hurt readability as much as to merit losing an S&G point, so S&G tied. Ergo, I award arguments to Con.
Vote Placed by 64bithuman 1 year ago
64bithuman
vi_spexFullMetal.AlchemistTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: A silly debate, but the resolution was for 'fart' not 'poo' (I honestly never pictured myself writing that in a debate vote) and also Pro never actually backed up his side of the argument, on which the BoP rested. The argument that was presented was actually barely human (I don't really understand most of Pro's points). Spelling goes to Con.