The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

god is a unicorn

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/18/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 547 times Debate No: 92868
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)




belief is truth, knowledge, so you see, my ice dragon will silence the escape of your unicorn


Before i state my arguments, let us define such motion.

The supporting side - that is the side Affirmative must do the Two following things to prove that god is an unicorn. Otherwise, since there is not enough solid evidence (or arguments) we can not conclude for certainly that god is a unicorn. And hence the argument shall not stand.

Firstly, the supporting side must give arguments and evidence to why god is a unicorn

Secondly, the supporting side must define why god cannot be any other creature (know or unknown to man)

If the supporting side failed to do one of the two above requirements, we can no longer conclude that god is Solely a unicorn.

Thus the argument shall not stand.

(P.S. sorry for the bad english @@ )
Debate Round No. 1


thing is i believe god is a unicorn, this knowledge is evidence..

you are con, you prove why god is not a unicorn.. or you are not con


Well in common debate speeches ,the supporting side (host side) have the responsibility to prove its statement while the opposition (that is me) will be hell-bent in providing counter arguments and rebuttals :P

But since this is not the case, may i have the priviledge to inquire :
How do you gain such knowledge as God is a Unicorn ?
Debate Round No. 2


truth is evidence, belief is truth


Thank you for your response, however, it may seem that your arguments lack enough evidence.

I would like to propose my rebuttal according to the For's side logics (who believes one's personal believe can act as evidence/truth)

1) If a believe alone can act as "truth", more believers means more "truth"

2) There are far more believe as God is not a unicorn than God is a unicorn

(Christians:2,100,000,000 adherents
Muslims:1,500,000,000 persons
Baha'is:7,400,000 adherents)

To conclude, as the supporting side lacks sufficient evidence & the number of believes that "God is not a unicorn" brings a greater "truth"

Therfore, this motion shall not stand
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
No votes have been placed for this debate.