The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mason_Tut
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

god or nut

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Mason_Tut
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/6/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 360 times Debate No: 73002
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

the existence of religion=theists believe there is a nut inside the unbrekable nutshell, and atheists believe there isnt, while the agnostic accepts he dosnt know, and that they ofc dont know either
Mason_Tut

Con

From what I could gather, I presume that you are arguing for the creationist point of view. I firmly believe that god does not exist, because there is little to zero logical evidence, which supports the god theroy.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

i have no beliefs


lies exist


is it resonable to believe there is a nut inside the nut shell? or that the nutshell is empty?

Mason_Tut

Con

Obviously lies exist. Your nutshell analogy is extremely vauge, what do you mean? It's rather vauge, please elabortate on the symbology.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

is god true?

is it resonable to believe that there is a nut inside an unbrekable nutshell?
Mason_Tut

Con

Creation by design is improbable at best. We know this is not only possible, but extremely likely, as stated by the theroy of evolution. Furthermore, God most definitely does not exist, because of glaring contradictions with the god theroy such as the omnipotence paradox, [Modernally stated as "Can god create a stone to heavy for himself to lift?], Which proves that total omnipotence is completely and logically invalid.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

are lies true?

i dont have beliefs. god can not create life because anything that is constructed or created is a machine, and nature is life

is the guy claiming there is a nut inside the unbrekable more or less resonable, then the guy claiming there isnt a nut inside it? who is right?
Mason_Tut

Con

Your "Nut in a nutshell" analogy is poor a best. To better restate this, is to say, "Does a god exist?" And, logically, a god cannot exist, because of the paradoxical nature of omnipotence, which defies logic. So it is reasonable to asume there is no god.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

lies exist
Mason_Tut

Con

Lies are a biproduct of human nature, I never stated they don't exist. But god most definetly does NOT exist. By simply stating that "Lies exist", you prove nothing, just the obvious fact that lies are things which exist.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
never heard of it
Posted by n7 1 year ago
n7
Spex how do you get around the Prime Radiant?
Posted by n7 1 year ago
n7
Weight?
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
balance
Posted by n7 1 year ago
n7
wtf????
Posted by TheWORDisLIFE 1 year ago
TheWORDisLIFE
lol
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 1 year ago
imabench
vi_spexMason_TutTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: as usual, pro failed to give any kind of a coherent argument