Debate Rounds (3)
Please note that the following terms are non-personalized and are issued directly before any debate I make:
1.Saying I didn"t cite my sources is not a supporting statement, common knowledge such as "issuing more money causes inflation" does not need a source.
2.No straw man fallacies please, an example of this would be saying "We should not return to the gold standard because that means carrying around bars of gold and that isn"t practical"
3.Don"t lie; an example of this is saying "carbon 14 can"t be broken down except by nuclear fission!"
Yes these are actual quotes from people that tried things like this, which is why I made these terms.
For this debate I will be discussing how we should and why we should return to the gold standard:
First and foremost is inflation, a gold standard would self-regulate how much money is issued as the US Treasury could only issue as much dollars as they can account for in gold, in addition, allowing a currency to be exchanged for gold would renew people"s faith in the US Dollar as humans innately consider gold and silver valuable, a piece of paper connected to precious metals will be automatically considered more valuable than a piece of paper connected to a unconstitutional central bank (But that is another debate so I will not get into it now), seeing a dollar bill connected to gold and silver will almost eliminate inflation as it will be considered valuable, and value is only what we assign to something, as long as everyone considers it valuable, it is, gold is just better at convincing people that it is valuable than paper is. Eliminating inflation will be better for investment as less money will be lost to inflation in savings, increased investment will lead to more jobs as more businesses will be established, more jobs will lead to more revenue, which means more tax revenue, with steadily increasing tax revenue, the deficit will be eliminated.
Next is deflation, with the return of the gold standard and the elimination of inflation business owners will lose the need to charge more for their goods and services, leading to the dollars increase in value, which will lead to an increased minimum wage as 8$ will be worth more, slowly reestablishing a middle class, and shrinking the gap.
Third a gold standard would eliminate any centralized monopolization over the economy, the Federal Reserve will not be able to stage bubbles and bank runs, but the Federal Reserve is a different debate though.
I do not intend to create a straw man argument so I will state the opposing argument, and refute all of them:
Some people argue that the gold standard would not allow for immediate action,
I am refuting this by stating that the US Treasury could easily keep a reserve of gold and silver for immediate relief, and issue certificates against these reserves.
They also argue that carrying around bars of gold and silver would not be practical,
This is by far the weakest of their debates as no one was suggesting carrying gold bullion around but gold and silver coin and certificates.
Third they argue that in our current economy you could not buy something with gold and silver,
This is refuted by the fact that Texas has created the Texas Bullion Depository, and in Texas you can create an account with the Texas Bullion Depository by depositing gold and silver bullion or coin like depositing dollars into a bank, and transfer funds from it like a bank account, and use this account or physical gold and silver to pay your taxes, which led businesses to accept bullion and coin.
All of this is economics or common knowledge, please do not use a blatant statement like saying I did not cite for this debate, anything else I am more than willing to (and did) provide sources as seen below:
My opponent is correct in the fact that a Gold Standard will halt inflation which could allow for a higher valued currency, this I agree on. However, this comes with a cost. If we were to switch to gold backing our currency, this will not mean other nations will follow. The United States currently enjoys the benefits for having the world's reserve currency, and if were to suddenly relinquish that position in global dominance, China would be quick to reimburse. Not only that but the market would have to adjust to a higher valued dollar. Lets say the dollar today became 10 times more valuable, this might seem good on paper, but this would lead to a chain of events causing people to start hoarding money which can lead to poor business productivity, that leads to lay offs, this can go into a spiral finally ending in an economic bust. My opponent explains on how a GS would lead to little inflation (true) and how this would lead to economic growth. This is false, when a nation uses the Gold Standard, it effectively caps its economic growth to the amount of gold it can mine. Meaning that there isn't enough money to go around for everyone, moreover, a economic ceiling would be reached. For the United States this is bad news, one of the only reasons we have such high economic prosperity is because we abandoned the Gold Standard and its economic ceiling, if we were to regress, one can see a decline in GDP... not good. The Federal Reserve was stated to be for another debate, so I will leave it untouched in my arguments. Now the Pros claim that a gold backed dollar will be seen in higher light is completely untrue due to human nature. In our current society we do not posses and peoples that refuse to use currency, for it is not backed by gold, no such person can survive in modern society without complying with our financial methods. Also there is another huge flaw with the GS, you can easily override it by claiming gold is worth nothing to your society, and you'll much rather use some other form of currency backing. If this were to occur in our globalized economy it could be a catalyst for economic disaster.
Sorry for short and lazy response, did not know it was a 24 hour round so I rushed myself.
Again, sorry for the lackluster response, I am very busy and I regret accepting this debate. If only I looked if it were going to be a 24 hour round debate.
Again, my opponent failed to reply to the fact that a GS would lead to economic ceiling due to lack of gold to uphold the current US GDP. Meaning we would see a decrease in business activity leading to lower consumerism, which spirals into an economic bust... we do not want another Great Depression.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.