The Instigator
frccandrew
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
glavytrain
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

gun rights

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/11/2016 Category: Politics
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 174 times Debate No: 86433
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

frccandrew

Con

Gun rights should be restricted in order to prevent mass shootings and or gun violence.
glavytrain

Pro

So... you wanna talk about guns?
Debate Round No. 1
frccandrew

Con

frccandrew forfeited this round.
glavytrain

Pro

glavytrain forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
frccandrew

Con

frccandrew forfeited this round.
glavytrain

Pro

glavytrain forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by RonPaulLibertarian 9 months ago
RonPaulLibertarian
People will get illegal substances no matter what. By restricting guns, you restrict the constitution. Imagine in a scenario that guns would be taken away from citizens (breaking their constitutional right) and someone gets an illegally smuggled gun and decides to shoot up a restaurant. A person in that restaurant would be allowed to have a gun under the constitution, but were restricted because of regulations, and the person that goes to shoot up the restaurant is successful because an average citizen is no longer to provide defense with a gun even though they have that right. If you restrict gun rights, you fundamentally don't understand the constitution.
No votes have been placed for this debate.