The Instigator
blaz303
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
iamfromdebatewars
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points

guns should be outlawed yes or NO!!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
iamfromdebatewars
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/18/2016 Category: Society
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 349 times Debate No: 89833
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

blaz303

Con

Guns should not be outlawed because guns are protection and if you ban guns the bad people of the world could use the black market to buy guns
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

Guns are dangerous. They kill people. They are slaughter machines.
In many countries like UK there is peace without guns.
Debate Round No. 1
blaz303

Con

even if the UK has peace without peace we are not because there is a bunch of psychos in this world
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

Buddy we wont need guns if a country has proper gun control like UK or Canada. Psychos are everywhere even in Canada and UK but still the crime rates are low due to the presence of proper gun controls.
Debate Round No. 2
blaz303

Con

blaz303 forfeited this round.
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
blaz303

Con

blaz303 forfeited this round.
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
blaz303

Con

blaz303 forfeited this round.
iamfromdebatewars

Pro

iamfromdebatewars forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Kescarte_DeJudica 10 months ago
Kescarte_DeJudica
I feel that in this debate, no one is discussing what I would consider to be the key points of the argument, especially on the "con" side. The key question is, do gun control laws actually work? Do they keep the guns out of the hands of criminals who would use them for devious purposes? And then also, what if someone only wants to have a gun so that they can "defend" themselves against "criminals" who have a gun? I think these are all good points that merit discussion.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Kescarte_DeJudica 9 months ago
Kescarte_DeJudica
blaz303iamfromdebatewarsTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: I don't think either side made very convincing arguments, nor did either of them finish the debate, which looked like they both gave up. Neither side quoted sources, and both had okay conduct. However, Con used no punctuation, which made his argument difficult to follow. Therefore, Pro wins on the basis of having better grammar.