hell is to much heaven
Debate Rounds (5)
on the path of being predictable, a demon is riding a bicycle
My opponent is an Atheist because common sense says anyone who discredits religion on the basis of illogicality has that strain of thinking. I must say though I do hold anyone over the age of 30 an Atheist in High esteem because truth to be told they are very Scientifically Literate and vastly Educated. But ignorance is not a excuse.
Are men superior then women? Honestly I don't know how an Atheist can answer that. They'll say in the public sphere that they are. But with no rules or ethics which they deemed changeable as evolution occurs.Random and nothing. What does an Atheist think of when the aforementioned question is asked? Better yet what can they conjure up?In that mind of theirs. Which is of course something very fascinating indeed. The Human brain processes information at an astounding rate. There are 100 billion neurons and 1 quadrillion Symantec connections. I don't think the report said "Brains of Stephen Hawkings Calliber" but just "A" brain. Never the less even with the Science now known to us. There are still stupid people or in proper terms Less Knowlegeble people as we all in the world can decipher. No matter how Smart or Knowlegeble a person is there still Limited. What necessitates the reason to follow limited minds like Richard Dawkins or you for that matter When God is unlimited. Back to the matter at hand. "Many Amongst the men have attained perfection I.E Ultimate God Conciousness but among the women only four Attained it. Khadijah, Aasiyah, Mary and Fatimah" This predestined. That my Daughters my Daughters Daughters . My mother Sister all. Will fall short of that mark of perfection. So what does this mean? Does that mean that men are better because of their potential? But that doesn't mean that men attain the Highest level of Perfection either. For when the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said "The first for whom the Scales will be erected for is Umar Ibn AL Khattab." Then the Companions interjected " But Messenger of God! What about Abu Bakr? The Prophet said :Abu Bakr....Abu Bakr!!! For the likes of Abu Bakr there are no scales! And if there were. If the Faith of the entirety of Humanity was placed on one scale and just the Iman of Abu Bakr was put on the other the Iman of Abu Bakr would out weigh them All." Umar as well as Abu Bakr were Companions not Prophets. They were the two best after the Anbiya ( Prophets ) but back to the matter. There is a limit that anyone can go as for Faith. For we may Attain Perfection. But not the Perfect Perfection. That resides with the Prophets and the Companions. To say that women are less then men is Blind. But to also say that women are equal 100% 50/50 not 49% or 50.1% is lame. ( Albert Einstein said something about this matter ) n9 doubt To God were all equal. But we care not For God right now. Truthfully said we care for the Now within the Now. And with that is evident that Men are superior based on these reasoning of Divine and Logic.
Now what is the Atheist going to say? Based on Biological reasons? Common sense says this. The gender that finds food protects it's family. Can have multiple kids with different spouses while not being constrained to having one child. Is obviously superior. But we await the next rounds
an atheist is a disbeliever, i dont disbelieve christianity, i know its false.
i dont understand why you are not talking about heaven or hell
You went on a different trajectory so I had done the same. My apologies. But Religion is not illogical. Rather I would argue that it is an item. A tool in simplified terms. You say that religion is illogical. Because most religious people when observations about the Universe is made the people of Religion quickly claim that God did it. But as Atheists with no Religion what so ever endeavor to see the Methods of it.It's not Religion that is Illogical but its followers. Because that goes for Atheists when they study the Actualization of the studied material must come to the deduction that God did it but they do not. And when Religious people realize how a creator willed it into being they should come to terms to how and the parameters of it. But that doesn't happen usually? Right? People often ask. But mainly the Atheists. Why does God put someone in Hell for eternity for living for only 50,60,70 years? The Scholars say that if a person was to live a life of sin. Then if the person was to live forever then that person would do exactly that. And that is true of obedience. That is the Wisdom of God Almighty. This life is a test. And with all the beauties. Of Women of Architecture of the Plants the Flowers the Animals the Sky and the Earth. On the Day of Judgement a man will be brought in front of Allah. And he lived the most pleasant and luxurious life. But he died disbelieving in God. And so God will dip him into the Fire of Hell for only a moment. And then question him. Did you experience any Good in the life you had? He would reply back. By you I experienced nothing.
religion is not an item, you can never have it in your hand.. you can believe in movies
without followers religion dosnt exist, religion is a position on an imaginary claim that denis reality
god is illogical, imaginary, you have no truth to tell about god like you do rocks
islam is a disgusting dead heard of walking corpses, specifikally the most distgusting life sucking piece of death soiling the earth where ever it goes as far as i know, anything to the contrary of life itself
your insanity is clear.. we are talking about heaven and hell, and you are just jammering on you retarded clown
Vaunteyo forfeited this round.
Vaunteyo forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff many times, so conduct to Pro.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.