The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points
The Contender
Kaynex
Con (against)
Winning
8 Points

here now is the limited size of my physical existence

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Kaynex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/5/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 477 times Debate No: 66444
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

A blind mans reality is not of colours and light
Kaynex

Con

"My imagination makes me human and makes me a fool; it gives me all the world and exiles me from it." - Ursula K. Le Guin

"I am my world." - Ludwig Wittgenstein
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

unless you define world as personal physical experience of now
Kaynex

Con

Perhaps you should define "experience of now" as the world?
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

the word world is like the word whirled, and the world is for the whirled

to me a star is a light in the night sky, and nothing beyond that, and the earth I know beneath me has no necessary shape
Kaynex

Con

Though the world may be for the whirled, we've already defined that the word world is personal experiences. Perhaps the whirled people of the world are an emulation of my whirled world.

Why is a star a light? Perhaps only dark really exists, and the stars are imaginary.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

all i can see with my eyes is light, and its true false or truth
Kaynex

Con

Kaynex forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

I think this means you win for some random religious reason spawning in fake nuts not belonging on trees
Kaynex

Con

Kaynex forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
arg, with my eye, not eyes
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Reeseroni 2 years ago
Reeseroni
vi_spexKaynexTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Becuz yolo sweg
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
vi_spexKaynexTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:41 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Pro. Con forfeited multiple rounds which is rarely acceptable conduct in any debate setting. S&G - Con. Pro failed to use proper capitalization in every round. Con made no errors of that sort. Arguments - Pro. Con failed to provide rebuttals to the remaining arguments presented by Pro. Due to letting Pro's arguments remain standing unchallenged, Pro wins these points. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.