All Big Issues
The Instigator
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

# i determine where logic begins and ends

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Gaming_Debater
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 11/27/2014 Category: Science Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 697 times Debate No: 65933
Debate Rounds (5)

 Pro cause+effect=logic the wind caused an apple to fall from a tree, the effect is the fall, the effect is the impact, the effect is the cause, the effect is the apple is no longer on the tree, the effect is the apple didn't get picked as it lay there to long and got worms in itReport this Argument Con "the wind caused an apple to fall from a tree, the effect is the fall, the effect is the impact, the effect is the cause, the effect is the apple is no longer on the tree, the effect is the apple didn't get picked as it lay there to long and got worms in it"This does not fulfill Pro's burden of proof as there is no telling for sure if he, in fact, thought this. Even if he did, there is no proof that he decided this.Report this Argument Pro I wrote itReport this Argument Con "I wrote it."not proof of anything as someone may have written it before him.Report this Argument Pro i remember i wrote it, so that is the truth, and true is nowReport this Argument Con "i remember i wrote it, so that is the truth, and true is now"This is circular reasoning. Pro is including his conclusion in his premises. His argument is:P1) If I write something, it is the truthP2) I wrote X statementC1) Therefore I determine where logic begins and ends.C2) Therefore X statement is trueEach line in this argument is simply a restatement of the previous one. His statement "true is now" is also a red herring.Report this Argument Pro i remember writing it, that is the truth, and true is now, physical experience only happens now, only now is matterReport this Argument Con "i remember writing it, that is the truth, and true is now..."This is only a restatement of what my opponent said in round 3. I already criticized this claim and pro did not defend it at all."physical experience only happens now, only now is matter"This statement is just another red herring.Report this Argument Pro read what i wroteReport this Argument Con "read what I wrote"I find the above command to be humorous and absolutely ridiculous. I read what you wrote in round 1 if that's what you mean but showed that it does not prove your case. Everything else you wrote, I debunked no problem. You are evidently either:1. A troll2. A sore loser3. In need of mental help4. Both 2 and 3Vote Con.Report this Argument
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Gaming_Debater 2 years ago
That's not a good reason and how is it relevant to his resolution?
Posted by ShadowHawk555 2 years ago
His causal agent comment
Posted by Gaming_Debater 2 years ago
Posted by ShadowHawk555 2 years ago
This time I actually agree with pro
Posted by Gaming_Debater 2 years ago
wtf?
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
I am a causal agent
Posted by Gaming_Debater 2 years ago
What's that got to do with it.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
intent=cause
random=natural cause
Posted by Gaming_Debater 2 years ago
An action is not logic. I read the argument.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
cause and effect might have no beginning and end, but there are causes and effects :)