The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
extian
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

i know more

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/7/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 5 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 365 times Debate No: 95245
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (13)
Votes (0)

 

vi_spex

Pro

because i get the votes.. and i am smarter.. cuz i vote mentally ;)

tsss
extian

Con

Pro is arguing that s/he knows more. S/he has not specified what superior knowledge s/he has, and has not demonstrated how getting votes indicates superior knowledge. Pro must also demonstrate how mental votes are relevant.

To recap, the burden of proof is on Pro to demonstrate that s/he actually knows more to win this debate. To do this, Pro must specify what knowledge s/he has more of, and how s/he knows "more" about it.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

obviusly there can be no defeater to unlimited power
extian

Con

Well, okay then....

Pro is asserting that s/he has unlimited power, but has not demonstrated that this is indeed true. Moreover, the resolution is "i know more," not "i have unlimited power," so this is a complete non-sequitur. The only thing Pro has demonstrated is a lack of knowledge about proper punctuation and spelling, so on that alone the resolution fails. Pro has still not specified what s/he knows more of and in relation to what, so without more information there is no reason to believe Pro knows more about anything than anyone.

The burden of proof remains unmet.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

nope, my race car is simply unique
extian

Con

So, not only has Pro failed to defend the resolution, but his/her answers grew increasingly bizarre. I feel there's not much more to say here except that I hope Pro has enjoyed this exercise as much as I haven't. Cheers.
Debate Round No. 3
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by whiteflame 5 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: Trombonist// Mod action: Removed<

4 points to Con (S&G, Arguments), 1 point to Pro (Conduct). Reasons for voting decision: I honestly believe that Pro had better conduct for this debate as in the final round, Con stated, "I hope Pro has enjoyed this exercise as much as I haven't." That was uncalled for and wasn't necessary for the debate. Con had the better grammar as Pro didn't use a capital letter once. While I would assert that Con didn't present any evidence that they knew more and that the burden of proof wasn't necessarily only Pro's to bare, Pro simply refused to knowledge this point. Therefore the convincing argument point goes to Con. Nobody used sources, so that point is a tie.

[*Reason for removal*] (1) Conduct is insufficiently explained. The voter is required to do more than merely point to one debater's exasperation with the debate and state that that was a violation. Unless it's clear that one of the voters was engaging in personal attacks, had forfeited a round, or was using rude pictures or words, conduct may not be awarded. (2) S&G is insufficiently explained. The voter is required to provide reasoning for why the writing in question impaired their understanding of the arguments given. A lack of capitalization is likely not going to meet that threshold. (3) Arguments are insufficiently explained. The voter is required to specifically assess arguments made by both debaters. The voter fails to do so, instead talking about BoP generally and never examining how Pro fails to meet it. Even if it's clear, it must be stated as part of the RFD, as must what that BoP is.
************************************************************************
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
consider this statement.. whatever i say is true
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
clueless noobies
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
so there is no need for a con i see.. as you are not debaters huh
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
i am not religious
Posted by Throwback 5 months ago
Throwback
vi_spex has as a goal to destroy the mental capacity of every user of this site by association with his ignorance, bringing us, if it was even possible, down to his level. Congratulations to Extian for taking this debate and losing 10 IQ points on this idiot's altar to stupidity. Welcome to my world!
Posted by extian 5 months ago
extian
Ummm, actually Pro has the burden of proof here. Sorry, buddy.
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
you are con.. i have no burden
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
vote now xD
Posted by vi_spex 5 months ago
vi_spex
something=something
No votes have been placed for this debate.