The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RonaldTrumpkin
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

i know what an algorhytm is

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
RonaldTrumpkin
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/9/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 376 times Debate No: 93535
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

RonaldTrumpkin

Con

I believe my opponent does not know what an algorithm is. He has shown over a period of time to make his arguments based off of semantics and trollery. He appears in no way to be serious or to have any true desire to be on this site, so why would he bother to research algorithms or what they are. I can guarantee with 100% certainty his next response will be a bunch of nonsensical garbled language and will in no way offer any arguments or rebuttals that remotely relate to the topic at hand.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

i am the only debater here.. no arguments stand to the contrary

pew pew.. rip
(algorhytm)
RonaldTrumpkin

Con

Please just ban this joker. I don't want to waste my time arguing with a brick wall.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

no arguments..
RonaldTrumpkin

Con

This is stupid.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
ye
Posted by dsjpk5 10 months ago
dsjpk5
"Pew pew rip". Hilarious!
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
the algorhytm of cons loss
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
i will state my case in round 2.. first round is for acceptance
Posted by vi_spex 10 months ago
vi_spex
looks better this way
Posted by ThinkBig 10 months ago
ThinkBig
Obviously you don't know what an algorithm is if you can't even spell it properly.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Bored_Debater 10 months ago
Bored_Debater
vi_spexRonaldTrumpkinTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to prove that he knew what an algorithm is, point goes to con for convincing arguments. Pro refused to take the debate seriously, conduct goes to con. Pro can't seem to spell and use proper grammar, point goes to con.
Vote Placed by Muslimdebater 10 months ago
Muslimdebater
vi_spexRonaldTrumpkinTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: The pro did not provide any valid argument in the first round. And in the second round either. The pro's debates are just like said by con are a garbled language. And makes no sense and the Con had a bit of sense in his argument.
Vote Placed by ThinkBig 10 months ago
ThinkBig
vi_spexRonaldTrumpkinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro has the burden of proof to show that he knows what an algorithm is. Granted that he cannot spell it correctly, nor did he do anything to demonstrate that he knows what it is, the vote goes to con.