The Instigator
Theostyn
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
emj32
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

i see a new United States.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
emj32
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/8/2013 Category: Economics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 550 times Debate No: 37498
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

Theostyn

Pro

i see a new United States.

with no president, and our army under the command of the senate.

Senators Shall never receive a bribe for a vote. under penalty of treason.

No war or alliance shall be made with any nation.

Our Military shall not conceal ANY information from the public.

Cut all Foreign aid.

allow any person citizenship as long as he/she did not commit a federal crime in there former country.

change the name of the army to The People's Militia

anyone within a political party may not ever be a candidate for President
(political parties just cause more separation among the people)

And no plant developed in nature shall be made illegal
emj32

Con

The resolution states "I see a new United States". However, I see no such new United States. In order for Pro to affirm the resolution, he must prove there is a new United States.
Debate Round No. 1
Theostyn

Pro

Theostyn forfeited this round.
emj32

Con

I guess my opponent, after all, does not see a new United States.
Debate Round No. 2
Theostyn

Pro

Theostyn forfeited this round.
emj32

Con

Still haven't seen a new United States.
Debate Round No. 3
Theostyn

Pro

Theostyn forfeited this round.
emj32

Con

Still no new United States....so sad.
Debate Round No. 4
Theostyn

Pro

Theostyn forfeited this round.
emj32

Con

What a shame, unfortunately the debate never started.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Rasecvita 3 years ago
Rasecvita
Con, very well played.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Chrysippus 3 years ago
Chrysippus
Theostynemj32Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I see a "debate" completely devoid of arguments. Pro did not back up any of his statements, and failed to present any coherent argument in favor of his manifesto. Forfeit gives arguments and conduct to Con.