i see not the unseen
Debate Rounds (3)
clear proof god is not real or that you have to believe in god for utter drivel to be honesty..
First of all, the premise of your argument is based upon the fact that you don't know the things that you don't know. However, I do not see how this is proof in any way, shape or form that God is not real.
As you have no way of proving that the God of any religion is nonexistent, your argument is essentially flawed and somewhat irrelevant. In addition to this, the premise you have used in this debate negates your conclusion, which is that god does not exist.
If you do not know the unknown, you know that you don't know that God doesn't exist.
This simply goes to show that the argument of side pro is crude and somewhat juvenile.
so you dont have to believe in god?
There is neither a way of proving or disproving the existence of God, so the conclusion at which you have arrived is fallacious in logic. The topic being debated over is not whether or not you have to believe in God, but whether or not side Pro can prove that god doesn't exist.
In addition to this, side Pro has stated that "things are known or true". This statement has no meaning and therefore does not lead to the following statement.
We have seen clearly today that side Pro lacks an actual argument and cannot defend their views.
In closing, I will finish this debate by pointing out that side Pro is unable to prove his conclusion.
Although I wish side Pro all the best, I would certainly hope that both they see the flaws and hypocrisies in their argument. Thanks for the debate, but I was honestly expecting more in regards to side Proposition's argument.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.