if both healthy baby and endangerd mother can be saved... baby should not be allowed to be aborted
Debate Rounds (3)
after six months or so of pregnancy, abortion in the US is restricted to only cases involving health of the mother. (to be sure, this includes much abuse for 'mental health' etc) if even a healthy baby MUST be aborted to save the mother, msot including me would agree it's the right thing to do. to be sure, however.... healthy babies are too often aborted in the name of saving the mother, when labor could be induced or teh baby somehow otherwise simply removed, instead of abortion.
the mother shouldn't have the option to abort a healthy baby when it can jsut be removed.
also, just because you, and me, agree that women should be able to abort when it's a rape (only for me, i think it has to be earlier), that doesn't mean it's illogical for someone else to disagree. they simply have different values.
dairygirl4u2c forfeited this round.
Magicr forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Ron-Paul 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||1|
Reasons for voting decision: First FF.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.