The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
GoOrDin
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

immoral=writing my own moral code, i see myself as moral in altering the truth

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
vi_spex
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/20/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 527 times Debate No: 82861
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (18)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

moral=right+intent

deadly poisonous mushroom=unhealthy
logical=dont eat poisonous mushroom to stay healthy
illogical=eat poisonous mushrooms to stay healthy

immoral=illogical
GoOrDin

Con

Morality: has defined parameters.
Virtues: have defined parameters.

Immorality is something contradictory to prescribed morals.

Morals are scientifically factually what leads to prosperity, equality and security.

anything contrary to Morals, which are already set within unchanging parameters which are applicable tot he Term Morality,

scientifically promotes social inequality, insecurity, inconsideracy, and inhibits prosperity.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

i dont see an argument

my point is i have to lie to myself, and create a moral fantasy for me to rape some one, hence altering the truth
GoOrDin

Con

1 = something = banana = apple
is a very interesting concept. it's very true. however strange.

However, I will argue that you do not "SEE" yourself as "moral" by writing your own moral code. You see yourself as proud and conceited. You would thus, "see" yourself as scientifically aware of social sciences, and the implication hey have on society on a grand scale; as that is the application of ethics.

but no, moral is not what you would see yourself as. AS Moral is defined and prescribed to have set parameters and aspects. A use of variable aspects and boundaries defies the definition of "Moral".

thank you.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

you dont have to believe in science to rape anyone..

i dont understand your point in any way
GoOrDin

Con

GoOrDin forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
GoOrDin

Con

GoOrDin forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
GoOrDin

Con

GoOrDin forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
18 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
anyways. You technically wont he debate by default based on your Thesis alone No conduct can change the over-ruling truth.
I've simply been stipulating over the general content of discussion.
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
that wasn't supposed to sound patronizing. It was supposed to sound as a supportive/humorous/maybe even ironic accord.
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
nor do I.
logic
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
agreed.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
i dont determine what is moral and immoral
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
right=logical=truth
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
sure. as a formula.

however what is right
and what an intent are
are determined by ethical sciences.

adultery promotes the abandonment of women as a culturally accepted aspect. WRONG.
It glorifies the perspectives of womanizers. That is a WRONG thing to do.
It corrupts ambitions and imaginations. that is not a RIGHT thing to do.
It causes depression and neglect and enmity etc... etc...

advocating atheism indicates to children, womanizers, criminals and perverts what is Right and Wrong is opinionated, not fact based. That is wrong. That glorifies the perspectives, behaviours and attitudes of womanizers, corrupt politicians, neglectful people, criminals, and doushbags (including internet trolls), and it corrupts the ambitions of children. THAT is an IMMORAL thing.

you can write down an accurate forumal Vi_spex, but to actually write your own moral code by suggesting what is RIGHT is up for grabs. That is Immoral. And you do not SEE YOURSELF as moral if you think immorality is moral. You in your conceit would thereby see yourself as "aware of scientific outcomes of behaviour." and be WRONG.

:)
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
morality=right+intent
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
that is no what I said. ur response was 100% in troll method. however,

regarding he debate,
just because you, "see" yourself as scientifically aware, doesn't mean that you are aware. But moral has a definition, and if u do not fit the definition then you can't see yourself that way.
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
i agree.. neutral is not right or wrong
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
vi_spexGoOrDinTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff many times, so conduct to Pro.