The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Julian-Harker
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

intelligence=see

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Julian-Harker
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/23/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 236 times Debate No: 91703
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (2)

 

vi_spex

Pro

past is contrast
Julian-Harker

Con

Intelligence is defined in many ways, revolving around the idea of one's capacity for logic, abstract thought, self awareness, communication and learning.

'Past = contrast?!' that doesn't even make any sense. Please elaborate on your arguments because you're not doing very well. Not only that, but you seem to introduce new things to debates that are completely irrelevant to the moot of your debates.

Do one thing for me, explain yourself on why you think the past is contrast.
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

the past is contrast
Julian-Harker

Con

Please explain more on why you think the past is contrast.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

seen

and unseen
Julian-Harker

Con

You are making absolute nonsense.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by whiteflame 8 months ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: HomelySherlock// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Pro. Reasons for voting decision: Pro made incredibly well-thought-out and logical arguments, whereas con's only rebuttal was "You are making absolute nonsense"

[*Reason for removal*] (1) The voter does not explain conduct, S&G or sources. (2) For arguments, the voter is required to examine specific points made by both sides in the debate. The voter does so for neither debater.
************************************************************************
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 8 months ago
tejretics
vi_spexJulian-HarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's burden of proof is to demonstrate that intelligence requires sight- merely repeating "past is contrast", an incoherent phrase, does nothing to achieve that goal, as Con points out.
Vote Placed by David_Debates 8 months ago
David_Debates
vi_spexJulian-HarkerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Seeing as this would be considered a troll debate, and therefore not moderated... Pro didn't use equal signs in his argument, making his argument immediately faulty. Also, props to Con for sticking to the topic. I've debated vi_spex, and it's incredibly hard to stay on topic, but you did it! My vote goes to Con.