The Instigator
jackgilbert
Pro (for)
The Contender
Pill_Junkie_Monkey
Con (against)

is God real?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
jackgilbert has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/24/2018 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 4 weeks ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 271 times Debate No: 107016
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (7)
Votes (0)

 

jackgilbert

Pro

Con goes first
Pill_Junkie_Monkey

Con

I reject your claim of God. You have the burden of proof. Also what is your definition of God?
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by Pill_Junkie_Monkey 4 weeks ago
Pill_Junkie_Monkey
@kitty_cat_LOL I don't know. It is a very popular debate topic.
Posted by kitty_cat_LOL 4 weeks ago
kitty_cat_LOL
why do people pick this topic all the time
Posted by SanpleYoutube 4 weeks ago
SanpleYoutube
It is real!!!! Many people saw the miracles of the god!!
Posted by Pill_Junkie_Monkey 4 weeks ago
Pill_Junkie_Monkey
Null hypothesis. I reject your posit, whilst not making my own. You don't win by default. :D
Posted by jackgilbert 4 weeks ago
jackgilbert
The burden of proof does lie with me to start, however, con has to present an alternative idea for his case to be valid.
Posted by lIlIlIllIIIIllIlI 4 weeks ago
lIlIlIllIIIIllIlI
Agreed, if Con suggests that there is an alternative, however; the burden of proof is shifted.
Posted by ChurnedCreamery 4 weeks ago
ChurnedCreamery
The burden of proof could be shifted if the assessment was how was the Universe created or is there an alternative to God. The assessment is correct and Pro must prove the existence of God whereas Con must prove that God doesn't exist. Con can't prove the lack of God existing however as proof of God not existing.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.