The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
5 Points

is ethan sayer fat

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/8/2014 Category: Health
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 509 times Debate No: 54275
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Ethan Sayer is extremley fat because he spends every second of his life eating peanut butter


I accept this debate.

I'd like to take this time to point out, though, that Pro has not made an argument As Pro, he is defending in this case a positive statement. However, he has provided no evidence -- not a single image, or a characterization of who this "Ethan Sayer" fellow is, or any evidence whatsoever. Therefore, he has failed to uphold his burden of proof and cannot possibly win on arguments.

Next, we need to bear in mind that adjectives are relative. He says that this fellow is extremely fat. Even if we accept him on his word, I must ask: fat relative to whom? He has no made this clear.

Then he claims that this man spends "every second of his life eating peanut butter." First, you can't conceivably spend every second of your life eating peanut butter because that would imply that every single you are pereptually chewing and shallowing peanut butter. But when you swallow, you cannot at the same time breath [1.]. So if this were the case, he would be dead. You said that he "is" extremely fat, which suggests the present tense, which suggests that he is alive. So not even the argument you have provided can be seen as the least bit valid.

Pro has not upheld his burden of proof, nor has he made a single coherent argument. Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by progressivedem22 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was the only one to actually make an argument and he provided a source.