The Instigator
marwa2013
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
birdlandmemories
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

is fasting good for you

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
birdlandmemories
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/15/2013 Category: Economics
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,100 times Debate No: 40593
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

marwa2013

Pro

Is fasting good for your health
birdlandmemories

Con

Thank you for starting this debate.
Fasting is not good for your health for numerous reasons:

1: Nutritional Standpoint:
When you fast, your body does not get as much of the necessary nutrients it needs. For example, if you eat only lunch and dinner, and skip breakfast, you are not getting the nutrients you need from breakfast.
2: Less energy:
Fasting gives your body less energy. When you skip breakfast, you are not getting energy early in the morning. When you skip lunch, you are not getting the energy needed during the afternoon. When you skip dinner, you are not getting energy at night.

I await my opponent's opening arguments.
Debate Round No. 1
marwa2013

Pro

marwa2013 forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 2
marwa2013

Pro

marwa2013 forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 3
marwa2013

Pro

marwa2013 forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Extend arguments.
Debate Round No. 4
marwa2013

Pro

marwa2013 forfeited this round.
birdlandmemories

Con

Vote con.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by gordonjames 3 years ago
gordonjames
marwa2013birdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: no S&G mistakes to pro as he did not show up.
Vote Placed by SPENCERJOYAGE14 3 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
marwa2013birdlandmemoriesTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF...