The Instigator
gageluc9
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points
The Contender
Maahi
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points

is god real

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
gageluc9
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/13/2013 Category: Religion
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 520 times Debate No: 35550
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

gageluc9

Con

some invisible guy floating in the sky (near airplanes?) and letting all bad things happen to a bunch of idiots that believe in him. But for atheists, they believe.. they believe everything on Earth came from one cell? Where did the cell come from? What proof do they have about all this stuff they say about the universe?

We laugh at stories in the bible yet books in school are teaching things atheists have no proof of either.. why does only Earth have life? Why were the dinosaurs killed? What happens when we die? I mean if we're going to laugh at one side I think it's only fair to see what the other surely has to offer as proof for not only their reason but proof of it existing.

So prove to me why the bible is wrong, why atheists are right and how I can test it. i want to test right now why God isn't real but I evolved from a fish and monkey a trillion years ago lol
Maahi

Pro

"why God isn't real but I evolved from a fish and monkey a trillion years ago lol"

# The idea that some chemicals reacted to form some primitive kind of DNA that led to subsequent development of life from simple to complex seems much more satisfactory/logical,than imagining that some supernatural being created us with some mythical powers.

http://en.wikipedia.org...;

^ Science,through various hypothesis and some experiments,attempts to resolve the mystery of how life might have started.The quest is still on.

http://en.wikipedia.org...

^ As many theistic religions, as many gods.Now,which god is the real god,who actually would've created life? Surely,these hugely diversified religions,with many contrasting principles and beliefs can't accept a single common god to be the creator.

All the theories that a religion proposes can't be proven.There should've been no need to prove the religious theories in the first place,since most of them claim to be the words from god.If that's the case,then why are there doubts about it?
Science is about experimenting,religion is not.The religious principles have already been written down ages ago and are not to be modified.They're already established.It's not to be experimented,it's not to be modified- and that implies that it must be the truth! If it's the truth,then how many truths are there ( since there are so many religions and so many gods) ? And which truth is the truest truth?
And if any one of them is truth,then why can't it be proved at all?

# If god created us,then who created god? And where was he before the creation? Why did he need to create anything?

Conclusion
:

Causation is better at explaining the beginning of life rather than creationism,thus contradicting the existence of god.
Since a religion itself fails to 'prove' that god exists,God might as well be just a mythical being.
Debate Round No. 1
gageluc9

Con

gageluc9 forfeited this round.
Maahi

Pro

So yeah...

I hope people vote for Pro.


To viewers:

I think the Instigator mistakenly took the Con's position.Whatever.



Debate Round No. 2
gageluc9

Con

gageluc9 forfeited this round.
Maahi

Pro

Vote for Pro.
Debate Round No. 3
gageluc9

Con

gageluc9 forfeited this round.
Maahi

Pro

Maahi forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
gageluc9

Con

gageluc9 forfeited this round.
Maahi

Pro

Maahi forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
gageluc9MaahiTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro because of the forfeit. Agruments to pro because they used fact instead of opinion. Spelling and grammar to pro because con forgot to capitalize letters and forgot periods at the end of sentences. Sources to pro because they were the only one to use sources.
Vote Placed by thedon22 3 years ago
thedon22
gageluc9MaahiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Con makes a very convincing argument.
Vote Placed by topgun0007 3 years ago
topgun0007
gageluc9MaahiTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: It made more sense for con. Pro had loopholes in her debate.
Vote Placed by masteryoda 3 years ago
masteryoda
gageluc9MaahiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: I just flipped the pro and con around. gageluc9 makes better points.