is homosexuality wrong from a non religious stand point?
Debate Rounds (3)
may I state I am not gay and would class myself as an anti-religious theist.
No, because it clearly exists in the physical world.
And if it exists it is perfect - how could it be anything else.
In this way, all information is neutral.
If you want to take a position to say whether it is wrong or right
regardless of what standpoint you use , becomes a subjective issue
which must then rely of imagination -the lowest form of knowledge.
It is not truth. It is not to be relied upon. If it were we would all think the same
But let us swing back to why you asked this question.
I can appreciate your argument and the need to want to ask this question.
It is interesting to me because I was trained in molecular microbiology.
One special area of interest to me is evolution.
You are saying "Yes because of evolution based on the fact that such couplings are fruitless
and therefore not useful or not productive, as in machine efficiency?
Therefore they are not intended by evolution, thus therefore wrong?
Just so we can be clear, do tell and thanks for the debate.
Well homosexuality may be encoded for in the genes of some or however
it is effected makes little difference.
And nature knows best. So if you wanted to say nature was wrong or imperfect
then that becomes this argument.
The DNA replication does not know what it is doing at the time.
It cannot take responsibility for its actions retrospectively.
All reproduction and life is at the most basic level is ultimately the actual DNA replication, and any traits that come along with it are incidental -the parts that make me me and you you are ultimately self programmed.
Gay because of self programming is valid position since no position is right or wrong (since all information is neutral).
Gay because of inherited Genes is valid because the person has no choice in his/her homosexuality.
Life, Evolution and reverse entropy is an incredibly wasteful process.
Only a minute percentage of the suns energy is converted into life
For every sperm or egg that goes unfertilised there will be an advantageous effect on the chances
of fertilisation for other eggs and sperm.
Every sperm is not sacred :)
sabarashy forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.