is nascar a sport
Debate Rounds (3)
http://www.thefreedictionary.com... . Although Nascar is definitely competitive, requires skill, and has an entertainment factor, it is not by definition "physical exertion", for it is not a form of "regular exercise" that "keeps one fit" and does not in any sense exert muscle movements on par with getting one "fit". Instead of competing with physical attributes such as strength, flexibility, or agility, Nascar drivers are dependent on variables such as the type of stock car, the various virtue's of said car, and if that car breaks down during the competition. Rather than using physical tools to compete , such as strength, agility, and flexibility, Nascar drivers are using various techniques on an independent source, rather than one self. Rather than classifying NASCAR as a sport, it should be considered an activity no different than video games, since one is applying techniques and a certain skill set to an already independent source. If driving a car was physical exertion, then how could there be 253 million cars and trucks on the road in the USA each day, with over 2/3 of these very same drivers overweight/ obese? http://www.latimes.com...
http://frac.org... . It is simply not possible.
However, PRO has failed to supply genuine information. PRO has plagiarized another's work , word by word, in his first argument and thus foundation. Considering the ancillary details of PRO's arguments to be not taken in account, PRO has forfeited the first round. http://www.debate.org... Look for the first comment in the YES section. It is very clear PRO has plagiarized "Gilles" work. I expect PRO to forfeit first found and seek a new foundation to his argument.
Furthermore, the second round was a mere unsupported statement that did not comply with my definition of "physical exertion" in any capacity. With physical exertion being axiomatic in order for a thing to be called a "sport", his assertion must be struck down. In addition, it is proven that high temperatures (up to 170 degrees Fahrenheit in a Stock Car) in conjunction with high G-forces (3 G forces at 200 miles per hour), contribute to 5-10 pounds lost during a race, all from sweat. Asserting this would be a sport would also be supporting sitting in a Sauna as one and the same, for both cause the participants to sweat profusely and thus lose weight. http://www.cnn.com... However, this does not comply with my definition. The driver is not exerting enough physical force in order to be fit (operating car), rather the car exerts forces on the driver in order for said weight loss, which does not comply fully and adequately with the definition of a sport. In addition, PRO seems to claim that I did not assert in my statements that NASCAR was competitive. This is disproven due to my statement below in the 1st argument.
"Although Nascar is definitely competitive, requires skill, and has an entertainment factor, it is not by definition "physical exertion", for it is not a form of "regular exercise" that "keeps one fit" and does not in any sense exert muscle movements on par with getting one 'fit'".
NickTheRationalPolitician forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by BoggyB 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||6|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro because cons forfeit. Everything else to Con.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.