The Instigator
birdlover
Pro (for)
Tied
1 Points
The Contender
Death_Angel3495
Con (against)
Tied
1 Points

is suggestive art right or wrong?why?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/25/2013 Category: Arts
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 841 times Debate No: 41202
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

birdlover

Pro

wrong because it pollutes your mind
Death_Angel3495

Con

1 it does not pollute your brain. art is art. Drawing, Photography and music are all a forum of art no matter what the case may be, students who have suggestive art should be allowed but they have to stop at a certain point and how does it "pollute" the mind
Debate Round No. 1
birdlover

Pro

if a 4 year old sees a poster that says F--- you he will start to think that it's ok , and small children shouldn't be exposed to sexually suggestive art - that includes music, movies, TV shows, and social media.
Death_Angel3495

Con

1 why hell would you have a 4 year old in your room and parents need to watch their mouths in order to keep their 4 year old from swearing
Debate Round No. 2
birdlover

Pro

who says that the 4 year old is in your room, suggestive art is everywhere , when you watch TV your practically watching porn . everything has dirty jokes in it .how can you keep children away from it ! its in magazines and books.Now, i'm not saying that people cant make art like this but they certainly shouldn't parade it around.
Death_Angel3495

Con

there is no "porn" in daily life you make it perverted and and you make the jokes dirty
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Technicallyderped 3 years ago
Technicallyderped
You're both terrible at this. xD
Posted by JacobAnderson 3 years ago
JacobAnderson
You didn't start the debate correctly, so I am not willing to enter the debate. I may suggest that you open this as an "Opinion" in order to effectively see the results because it does not appear like this is going to be a satisfactory debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Yraelz 3 years ago
Yraelz
birdloverDeath_Angel3495Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: I agree completely with Mikal, this debate had no substance at all. That said I think Pro had the better grammar... lol
Vote Placed by Mikal 3 years ago
Mikal
birdloverDeath_Angel3495Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: This was horrendous. Pro claims suggestive art is bad and claims it is morally not permissible. He offers no reasoning as to what morality is or why we should consider it morally wrong. Con says it does not pollute the minds of people and is a type of expression. This goes back and forth with no one giving any valid information to support their side. The only thing I can judge this on is better spelling from con. Pro made numerous errors and had many fragments. Noob debate but con still wins.