The Instigator
aswinisri
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
STALIN
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

is the city culture right or wrong?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
STALIN
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/25/2013 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 572 times Debate No: 42948
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

aswinisri

Pro

i have a doubt that the city culture we follow is suitable at everytime or not?
STALIN

Con

Any culture is suitable. It just depends on the person. I don't think Pro can make any arguments here.
Debate Round No. 1
aswinisri

Pro

no the city culture influences every person . so it is not depended upon a person. pls understand tat my argument is whether the city culture is right or wrong.
STALIN

Con

City culture is the culture of towns and cities. My opponent does not show what is wrong with city right or wrong with city culture. He doesn't even make his position clear. In this situation, I will take the position that city culture is right. I argue that city culture is right because it is a good way to live. People fit well and tightly which results in a good use of space provided by this world. My opponent made no arguments so I easily win this debate.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by brains 3 years ago
brains
city life cant be just wrong or absolutely right. there are many good and bad things about living in a city. Stalin, great profile picture. its not precisly know what the debate is about? and i think you are both right!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Tophatdoc 3 years ago
Tophatdoc
aswinisriSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither side provided an argument backed by any evidence. Pro failed to provide an argument. This debate suffered from the lack of argumentation. Pro loses the conduct point for this. Good luck to you both in future debates.
Vote Placed by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
aswinisriSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had arguments, which pro didn't.
Vote Placed by janetsanders733 3 years ago
janetsanders733
aswinisriSTALINTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Good job to both debaters. However, I have to award Con because he gave a better argument, while Pro did not elaborate well enough.