The Instigator
vaclav
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Protagoras
Con (against)
Winning
29 Points

isabella latuga is a really anoyying and stinky person!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/27/2008 Category: Technology
Updated: 8 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,055 times Debate No: 4809
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (7)

 

vaclav

Pro

isabella is areally silly easily distracted student and that is why i dont like her!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Protagoras

Con

Hello voters! Hopefully you enjoy this, because it really upsets me whenever someone creates useless debates like this. Mind you, the only reason why I accepted this is because I want this trash to stop wasting away in the "challenge section".

Without further ado, I offer you the "arguments":

__________________________

Proof:

My opponent, being the person in favor of the topic, has the burden, or obligation, to prove to you that Isabella Latuga is truly an "annoyying and stinky person".

His argument consists of a claim that Isabella is a silly and easily distracted person and that is why he doesn't like her. Whether or not this is true, this analysis does not offer insight upon whether or not Isabella really is an annoying and stinky person. The only thing we learn from my opponent's opening statement is that he does not like Isabella.

Since my opponent has yet to offer any sort of proof for as to why the topic is actually true, you must default CON.

____________________________

Flaws within the topic itself:

• The term, "annoyying" does not exist within the english language, therefore the topic is inherently flawed, thus negated.

• The punctuation, "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" does not exist within the english language.

Wikipedia lists the following as proper punctuation's within the english language:

apostrophe ( ' ' )
brackets (( )), ([ ]), ({ }), (< >)
colon ( : )
comma ( , )
dashes ( ‒, –, —, ― )
ellipsis ( …, ... )
exclamation mark ( ! )
full stop/period ( . )
guillemets ( � � )
hyphen ( -, ‐ )
question mark ( ? )
quotation marks ( ‘ ', " " )
semicolon ( ; )
slash/stroke ( / )
solidus ( ⁄ )

http://en.wikipedia.org...

An "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" does not exist on this list, nor within any other lists that I have found. Therefore, the topic is inherently flawed once more, thus negated.

• My opponent describes the term "isabella" as a student, by definition of student, my opponent would be referring to a specific person. Proper nouns must be capitalized, yet "isabella" is not, therefore, since "isabella" is not a proper noun, it cannot be a person, hence it cannot be a student.

__________________________

In conclusion, you ought to vote in my favor because my opponent has not proven the topic true, his argument has correlation to the topic, and on top of all of that, he makes three critical errors within the wording of the topic itself. This is enough to vote CON.

I reserve the right to bring up new arguments in my next rebuttal.*

Thank you voters for your consideration,

- Protagoras of Abdera
Debate Round No. 1
vaclav

Pro

vaclav forfeited this round.
Protagoras

Con

My arguments still stand, thus, since they remain unrefuted, you must accept my arguments as valid and vote for CON.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

- Protagoras of Abdera

---Looking forward to your responses vaclav.---
Debate Round No. 2
vaclav

Pro

vaclav forfeited this round.
Protagoras

Con

Not to anyone's surprise, my opponent, the one who initiated this ridiculous debate, has once again forfeited. I ask you to extend all of my points and vote CON.

- Protagoras of Abdera
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Protagoras 8 years ago
Protagoras
Ha ha, I'm a bit confused, but thanks for the compliment.
Posted by Im_always_right 8 years ago
Im_always_right
LOL, hey Xera, I signed on as you in a conspiracy to see if you would catch it...LOL
Posted by Xera 8 years ago
Xera
Damn it this makes no sense. I was logged in as me, I have other posts made in my name logged in as me (http://www.debate.org...) Nothing has changed. I don't know how my danged computer has just changed users. Darlin' works nights so he wasn't here to switch things while my back was turned (he's ben gone for 5 hours now) IAR is at her aunts house, so she couldn't have done it, I doubt the infants could have climbed out of their crib to do it, and I'm equally as skeptical of the toddler and the 6 year old.

That was me speaking below. I"m sorry. I don't know what the hell is going on here. My computer is possessed by a poltergeist or something.
Posted by lorca 8 years ago
lorca
(my best valley girl impression)

But Oh my Gawd, Christian is so not hot!

Lol, yup sounds the same to me.

Good job Protagoras
Posted by Rezzealaux 8 years ago
Rezzealaux
Didn't we see a few of these debates before?

Who else thinks this is the same person?
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by pakipride 8 years ago
pakipride
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Protagoras 8 years ago
Protagoras
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by adaffodil 8 years ago
adaffodil
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by KirkPorter 8 years ago
KirkPorter
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by brian_eggleston 8 years ago
brian_eggleston
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Blessed-Cheese-Maker 8 years ago
Blessed-Cheese-Maker
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by DrAlexander 8 years ago
DrAlexander
vaclavProtagorasTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03