The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Yassine
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

islam should be banned from all civilized nations

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Yassine
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/10/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,498 times Debate No: 84817
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (38)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

islam spreads like a virus, so its very important that it dosnt infiltrate a society, gnawing the pillars of the foundation every persons right is founded on
Yassine

Con


Preface:



- As per the format of the resolution, Pro has the burden of proof to establish why Islam should be banned from all civilized nations




Case/Rebuttals:



islam spreads like a virus, so its very important that it dosnt infiltrate a society


- Bare assertion [1]. Non sequitur [2].


=> Logical fallacy.



gnawing the pillars of the foundation every persons right is founded on


- Bare assertion [1]. No argument.


=> Logical fallacy.




Conclusion



- Overall, Pro has made fallacious claims, invalid or no arguments, & provided no sources, thus failed to uphold his resolution. Given that Pro had the burden of proof to establish his resolution, since he failed, Con gets an automatic win.



=> Vote Con.




Sources:



[1] http://goo.gl...


[2] https://goo.gl...

Debate Round No. 1
38 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: HardRockHallelujah// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: I might agree with pro, but in a debate, you have to prove your case rather than simply making an assertion; for that I vote from Con.

[*Reason for removal*] The voter doesn't explain conduct, S&G or sources.
************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: persianimmortal// Mod action: Removed<

7 points to Con. Reasons for voting decision: sorry Pro but the title of the debate is neither a question nor a statement backed with proof. Voting Con

[*Reason for removal*] The voter doesn't explain any of the point allocations, merely discussing the resolution rather than anything stated in the debate.
************************************************************************
Posted by whiteflame 1 year ago
whiteflame
*******************************************************************
>Reported vote: mmurph123// Mod action: Removed<

6 points to Pro (S&G, Arguments, Sources). No arguments presented by the Affirmative.

[*Reason for removal*] The voter doesn't explain S&G or sources.
************************************************************************
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
sure, i just believe all muslims should be killed then, religion vs religion i guess we need that for you to realize the differene between insane and sane
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
sure, i just believe all muslims should be killed then, religion vs religion i guess we need that for you to realize the differene between insane and sane
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
impossible win
Posted by Dilara 1 year ago
Dilara
Freedom of religion?
Posted by Yassine 1 year ago
Yassine
- Easy win waiting to be grabbed.
Posted by tajshar2k 1 year ago
tajshar2k
@Yassine Why even try lol....
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
out there represents existence by the question, and my experience of out there is not real
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Leugen9001 1 year ago
Leugen9001
vi_spexYassineTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro compared Islam to a "virus", but he did not demonstrate that it actually is a virus; he did not elaborate at all. Pro made the valid point that if Islam were a virus that infiltrated and destroyed society, it should be banned, but pro did not provide evidence to back up the idea that Islam is a virus, making his point moot--the logic was sound, but the biggest premise, that Islam is a virus, was not demonstrated. Con correctly pointed this out, saying that Pro merely made an assertion without backing it up, and this won Con his argument point.