The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
CuriousFear
Con (against)
Winning
22 Points

islam=terrorism

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
CuriousFear
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/27/2016 Category: Religion
Updated: 9 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 417 times Debate No: 95026
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (4)

 

CuriousFear

Con

Oh might as well post a video myself.
https://www.youtube.com...
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

didnt watch it
CuriousFear

Con

Oh come, on. Don't you want to see a scholarly opinion? Instead of making a claim and posting some silly vine compilation, you can also bring your evidence from scripture.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by canis 9 months ago
canis
Yes without "build in" terror, islam would not exist.
http://www.billionbibles.org...
Posted by vi_spex 9 months ago
vi_spex
it is what it is
Posted by DocMan 9 months ago
DocMan
I do support the argument that Islam does equate to terrorism, but I feel Pro (as well as Con) could've been a bit more in depth. I would like to see this debate redone, but with factual evidence via historical sources and the Qur'an (an extremely violent text).
Posted by vi_spex 9 months ago
vi_spex
intelligence is forward, not banging your heads against the same wall over and over
Posted by vi_spex 9 months ago
vi_spex
what a muslim opponent
Posted by Bored_Debater 9 months ago
Bored_Debater
To funny. Haha...
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by warren42 9 months ago
warren42
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's notion of not even watching the Con video means Pro takes a hit in conduct. If you instigate a debate you should at least pay attention to what your contender has to say. Con gets arguments also as his video was from an informative perspective rather than a compilation of "bomb pranks"
Vote Placed by ThinkBig 9 months ago
ThinkBig
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Since troll debates aren't moderated (and this is a troll debate), I'm giving a full 7 points to con.
Vote Placed by KthulhuHimself 9 months ago
KthulhuHimself
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: The instigator did not even address the contender's round ("didn't watch it"), hence points for conduct go to the contender. BoP was on the instigator's claims, and none was put forth; hence points for argument go to the contender.
Vote Placed by TheCritic89 9 months ago
TheCritic89
vi_spexCuriousFearTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Not sure what Pro was trying to accomplish. If it was "accomplish nothing and fail the debate," then pro did a very good job.