it could never de determined through votes who won a debate
Debate Round Forfeited
Innkeep has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
|Voting Style:||Open||Point System:||7 Point|
|Updated:||1 week ago||Status:||Debating Period|
|Viewed:||130 times||Debate No:||95954|
Debate Rounds (3)
only, are the losers or non debaters revealed
You seem to suggest that there are not winners or losers of a debate. If the goal of a debate is to persuade an audience of your stance then the only measure of success would be a vote. I will accept this challenge with enthusiasm and humility.
Thank you and best of luck.
no votes can never be a tool to determine who won a debate.. argumentum ad populum.. its a fallacy..
impression means nothing, this is no singing contest... i am aware people see this as a kinder garden club
This round has not been posted yet.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click thelink at the top of the page.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.