The Instigator
vi_spex
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Con (against)
Winning
3 Points

kNow=physical experience

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/14/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 268 times Debate No: 75274
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

vi_spex

Pro

how do you know if a coffe cup is to hot to grab?

8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

How do you know the coffee cup is there to grab at all?
Debate Round No. 1
vi_spex

Pro

i see it on a few meters distance before grabbing it wondering if its to hot, how do i know

8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
vi_spex

Pro

zzzzzzzzzz
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

Pro has yet to give a single argument in support of the resolution. His question is if we know if something is hot before we 'physically experience it'. My rebuttal is that we know nothing is physical to begin with and that no physical experience could validate that.
Debate Round No. 3
vi_spex

Pro

so you dont know if a coffe cup is to hot to grab?
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

That doesn't prove the resolution true.

For the resolution to be true, there has to be anything physical to begin with.
Debate Round No. 4
vi_spex

Pro

you cant close your eyes and read on.............. something physical is in the way of your sight
8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJA

Con

How do you know that?

If one can know there to be physical things in the first place then that knowledge was not physical in nature.

Checkmate.
Debate Round No. 5
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
vi_spex8elB6U5THIqaSm5QhiNLVnRJATied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for Con's forfeiture. Arguments go to Con as Pro never really gave an argument to uphold the resolution.