The Instigator
quintin
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
TBR
Pro (for)
Winning
7 Points

kids should be able to have concealed carry at age 10

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
TBR
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/14/2015 Category: News
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 687 times Debate No: 75282
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (7)

 

quintin

Con

kids should be able to get concealed carry at age 10 so they can protect them and other people
TBR

Pro

OK. I accept this.
Debate Round No. 1
quintin

Con

quintin forfeited this round.
TBR

Pro

TBR forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
quintin

Con

quintin forfeited this round.
TBR

Pro

asdfghjkl;
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by SirMaximus 1 year ago
SirMaximus
RFD:
Pro had better conduct, because Con forfeited 2 rounds, but Pro only forfeited 1 round. As for spelling and grammar, Con said, "kids should be able to get concealed carry at age 10 so they can protect them and other people", which clearly means that children should be allowed to carry guns in a concealed manner at the age of 10 years for defence of themselves and others. I was able to understand Con well. Pro said, "OK. I accept this." in the first round, which clearly means that Pro accepts the debate. I was able to understand that from Pro. However, I didn't understand the other thing that Pro said (what Pro said in Round 3): "asdfghjkl;". What does that mean? I know that those are the letters (and a symbol) that appear on one of the rows on a keyboard, but I'm not quite sure what Pro meant when Pro said that. So, Con wins spelling and grammar. As for arguments, Con said, "kids should be able to get concealed carry at age 10 so they can protect them and other people", which isn't really an argument, but just a statement of Con's opinion. Pro didn't make any arguments at all. Since neither of them made any arguments, they tie for convincing arguments. Neither of them used any sources, so they tie for reliable sources.
Posted by CommunistDog 2 years ago
CommunistDog
Kids are goats. Thus goats, or kids, SHOULD be able to carry a concealed weapon. Sadly God did not plan that in the series of evolution. ):
Posted by TBR 2 years ago
TBR
You choose con, but it sounds like you are pro, right? You WANT kids to be able to carry, right?
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by SirMaximus 1 year ago
SirMaximus
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:11 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD in comments.
Vote Placed by UtherPenguin 2 years ago
UtherPenguin
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited less rounds.
Vote Placed by Sarra 2 years ago
Sarra
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Teaparty1 2 years ago
Teaparty1
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: F
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by tajshar2k 2 years ago
tajshar2k
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff'ed more.
Vote Placed by Varrack 2 years ago
Varrack
quintinTBRTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con FF'd more rounds