The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

killing animals for food

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
abhijithdude has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/13/2016 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 563 times Debate No: 93697
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)




People are kinning animals such as goat ,chicken,fishes etc for their food .This is wrong


You have to kill animals, unless you want to eat them alive. I'd prefer a dead piece of meat myself...

If killing and eating animals is wrong, so is killing and eating plants. If we cannot eat once living things, we starve.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by liam2002 2 years ago
Sorry H.I.L not H.L.L
Posted by liam2002 2 years ago
depending where you are things might be different but in the united states it is usually considered wrong to kill and eat a dog, but it is perfectly acceptable to kill things like slugs or flies. what is the difference between the two that makes killing bugs ok but killing dogs not. The only reason I can come up with is that dogs can be pets, many people enjoy having pets. It will be impossible to convince everyone to not kill bugs.Although it would be easier to convince everyone to not kill dogs. They are both animals but people like dogs. I think that they're needs to be a some sort of way to organize them into levels. WIth intelligent animals like humans it should be considered wrong to kill them unless you have to, to save other intelligent animals "The needs of the many outway the needs of the few." WIth very stupid animals like bugs it should be considered ok to kill them, if they are annoying, or harming animals of higher intelligence. WIth animals like dogs that are pets in some places should be considered wrong to kill the animals that are pets to humans because it will emotionally harm the human. WIth hunting animals it should only be considered wrong to kill them without a licence or kill over a limit. This is because those kinds of animals can be very beautiful to look at. If the animal if higher intelligence needs to kill the lesser intelligence creature to survive it should be able to, but if we find another species smarter then humans they may not kill the humans due to the human's intelligence. If other animals become just as smart as humans than humans should not be allowed to kill them we can call this the human inteligence line or H.L.L for short. If a H.L.L status creature finds a new kind of species then it should not be ok to kill it because they should study it first.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.