The Instigator
fdsaBIG
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Zarroette
Con (against)
Winning
39 Points

killing anything should be legal

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
Zarroette
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/22/2014 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 561 times Debate No: 59408
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (10)

 

Zarroette

Con

Since Pro has the burden of proof [1], in that he/she must affirm the resolution, my opponent needed to provide arguments. My opponent has not affirmed his/her side by failing to provide arguments. Therefore, my opponent loses this debate.

References:

[1] http://www.nizkor.org...
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
Dang pro, you have to retarded opinions on stuff.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by kinsky 2 years ago
kinsky
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: no bop met
Vote Placed by QandA 2 years ago
QandA
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: No argument from pro. I never understood one round debates.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro had no arguments
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually made an argument.
Vote Placed by Preston 2 years ago
Preston
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Troll debate, you pretty much sniped this one, pro had no arguments.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Stop it Zarroette. No arguments from pro.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Poor grammar.
Vote Placed by Skynet 2 years ago
Skynet
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Probably a troll debate so they can post to forums for money, but no argument from Pro.
Vote Placed by FuzzyCatPotato 2 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to fulfill BOP.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
dsjpk5
fdsaBIGZarroetteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro offered no arguments.